Showing posts with label Commodities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Commodities. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Oil prices fall as supply continues its upward march

OPEC's plan to unravel years of price drops in oil markets is turning sour as a decrease in production has seen a temporary upward shift in prices, only to be thrown back down by the risk appetite of US producers who've subsequently opened it's abundant supply tap once more. 

As the evidence starts to overwhelming mount in support of additional cuts in production, the sturdiness of conviction by Saudi Arabia in terms of the level it expects to cuts erodes with every fresh report to be released.       

Graph courtesy of Bloomberg
The major US shale gas suppliers who managed to mitigate the headwinds of the price turmoil are eagerly looking for their reward which would go a long way to paying down the debt incurred during the uncertain period that's seemingly holding back good profits.

This will only serve to make the rebalancing process more complex than what it's put across due to the constant stop start motion of the US suppliers and possibly other global producers looking to deplete the surplus on hold.

Whichever way price turns to in the future we'll only know it's capability and trait once the voluminous stock is cleared, a situation that's far from over ...

Wednesday, 17 August 2016

Saudi Arabia showing signs of economic distress with low oil prices

The instability of oil prices in the last two years has meant bad times for many countries, especially those who are reliant on OPEC to interfere with the supply dynamics, suffering grave economic consequences as a result of lower but much needed revenue streams.

Chief culprit in the deliberate cascade of surplus oil finding its way into a demand-waning market has been Saudi Arabia whose steadfast conviction in budging out fresh competition cannot be discounted from the levels its gone to in ensuring difficulty for the newcomers entering a state of profitability.

However this hasn't come without cost as the world's largest exporter of oil has used its de facto position as leader of OPEC to influence market dynamics most often to the detriment of all parties involved in the collusive agreement with the economic pinch now hurting Saudi's fiscal budgetary plans that lie in jeopardy.    
Probably the biggest reason for the US having a propensity to seek out alternative forms of energy stemmed directly from the fluctuant state of affairs in most OPEC countries that's dictated supply to the rest of the world meaning less control by external forces.

In turn Saudi Arabia and many of its counterparts have used the abundance of this scarce commodity as a strategic resource used to distribute prosperity to its citizens instead of allowing the free market to concentrate the wealth in the hands of a few greedy individuals. As commendable as this societal approach might sound it requires a domineering government administration which on most occasions involves a suppression of its citizens instead of their liberation.

Such has been the case in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia where its citizens have been fed with state benefits for many a decade in exchange for implicit support for its monarch. But this understanding is coming under threat as the war on oil price heats up and the longevity of extensive means of action in place extended further into the future than intended.

The flummoxed leaders of Saudi Arabia hadn't bargained for the length of time needed to eliminate competition, a goal that's hardly given any relief to the flourishing inventory of oil sitting in storage. Just last week I wrote a piece detailing Riyadh's efforts to fight back at US shale gas producers and went on to say that its plan had lost the definition of being a short term dilemma and had begun moving into the realms of longer term risks disturbing the forced order.  

Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the youthful deputy crown prince and second in line to the throne has been vocal about his radical plan to shape Saudi Arabia from its over reliance on oil as a main component in its economy to a more diversified spread of sectors as a bold change needed to secure its future although his arrogance and lack of diplomacy regarding leniency to fellow OPEC members in recovering economically from a global trade hiatus (the member being Iran) hasn't won him over many friends.

Backed into a corner, Salman needs to tread the waters carefully so as to not upset the kingdom's standing with its people but at the same time wastefully spend its time fighting a price battle that will presumably end up with the free market gaining some sort of control over oil supplies. If he isn't successful in convincing Saudis of his grand plan the country could very well see unrest descend into its streets and the power of the monarch stripped from its existence.

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Is Saudi Arabia up to its old tricks again?

When the thought of oil returning back into bear territory became too good to be true, the Russian Energy minister Alexander Novak swooped in to rescue deflated expectations by coyly suggesting that his nations were open to negotiations if fresh talks were to begin regarding the issue of oil production freezes but went on to say that elevated prices would likely provide producers with relief rather than resolve at this current time.

Prices immediately rose on the news with many speculating that OPEC might use an upcoming informal meeting to be held in September to thrash out the possibilities of it happening with intentions of finding a better approach  dealing with the matter than they had done previously when not all members, namely Iran, could be drawn to agreeing to conditions set down.
But the prospects of this occurring in the not so distant future fell faster than a stone in water after de facto OPEC leader Saudi Arabia announced with much pleasure it had pumped out a record amount of oil for which it says was intended to cater for an increase in summer demand in the Middle East.

Riyadh may think this limp excuse may be useful in misleading the oil market relating to a downturn in prices where concerns have raged over demand being outstripped by abundant supply by falsely believing oil prices have bottomed, it does more to show the factionalism that cuts deep within the organisation following a series of disagreements as to the course of action needed to fight new competition.

This kind of statement that's hurriedly found its way into the news promptly after Alexander Novak comments of a possible freeze indicates Saudi Arabia's true feelings towards the issue. If it were to be brought up again it'll refuse to acknowledge a problem as it had done prior to its involvement that happened only because the Arab kingdom's finance's had suffered drastically as a result of the slump.

It's clear that Saudi Arabia's plan to rid the oil market of US shale gas producers is not one it sees itself warding off in the short term but rather a much  bigger threat that necessitates the argument for continuous attacks aimed reducing the profitability of their ventures, the most profound strategy being a deliberate effort to flood the market with cheap oil.

The news shouldn't be seen on the face value of it but rather a signal that tensions are rising amongst OPEC members again and possibly an indication that we'll see weak oil prices going into the end of the year.

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Technical Tuesday: Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

Monthly 


Firstly it must be noted that the stock chart used in this article derives its price from the Euronext stock exchange denominated in Euros. The reason why I've highlighted this aspect is because this stock is a multinational corporation with several listings elsewhere including the London and New York Stock Exchanges which would price the shares in the respective countries currency. 

In saying this by analysing the stock in Euros you might not yield the same sentiment if priced in another currency due to the relativeness of each currency to one another. 

Looking at the chart we see price has been stuck in a sideways motions within a considerably wide range over the last number of years. I've excluded the use of moving averages from it as the whipsaw movement of price would make the indicator ineffective. 

The price shows a strong correlation with general price movements in global equities up until 2014 when the price of oil peaked. The uptrend, marked in green, remained in place from its origins in 2009 to its failed attempt to break pass the previous high last set in 2007 which admittedly had the hallmarks of a trend with vigorous ability to set the outlook higher.    

However what we've seen afterwards is an unexpected failure coupled with a flurry of buyers scrambling to exit positions with the resultant outcome of the price reaching support marked out at the bottom of 2009 in relative quick succession with an exceedingly strong move off the lows that ended the slump.  

Lastly the RSI has breached underneath the 50 level suggesting momentum favouring the sellers. To add further evidence to this belief I've circled an area on the indicator where it tried to surpass the mark yet failed leaving behind trails of optimism. 

Daily 


In contrast to the monthly I've attached moving averages to the Daily over a period of one year as we've seen a great deal of swaying in the price. Immediately noticeable is the bounce off the lows registered in January following the sudden change in view regarding the supply & demand dynamics in the oil market. 

Although a distinct trend can be seen the distance between subsequent retests is far too long to establish any real threat to the downtrend which is why I classified the upward motion a bounce rather than an uptrend. 

This has caused the price trend to become vulnerable to heavy selloffs that have occurred in the last two weeks.  The ease with which price sliced down past the trendline indicates the sellers are still dominant in the current market environment. 

Added to this is a potential Head & Shoulder formation that normally appears at the end of a strong up move. The right shoulder has yet to form but judging by the position of the stochastic indicator, there's still space for price to move upwards before it gets into overbought territory. 

If price were to fall below the 200 day moving average (blue line) the sellers would take full advantage and commit an attack on the buyers that could inflict damage to their hope filled mindsets. 

Friday, 5 August 2016

US oil industry still bothered by debt piles

As the pick up in shale gas producers filing for bankruptcy grips oil production in the US a new concern is starting to emerge over the indebtedness of "Big Oil" after numbers suggest these firms have steadily become reliant on using cheap money to satisfy dividend payments to stockholders.

The distressed nature of the oil industry is such that firms need to see higher prices to be confident of obtaining the bounteous offerings the sector once gave to investors. However with the stability of oil supply becoming irregular following OPEC's commitment to disrupt new competition as well as the limited economic growth expected globally, one wonders if the optimism that's re-entered the prospects of the oil market might've stretched further than practicality.

When considering all commodity prices came under severe pressure over the last two years due to a larger than expected economic contraction from China, big oil firms were better placed relative to major mining players in terms of their balance sheets which can't be denied given the resounding margins made when oil prices sat at lofty levels close to $100.

In the article below it's suggested that oil majors could be forced into restructuring their books with the swells of debt growing by the year. If this were to happen on the scale we've seen happen with global miners it would most definitely shape up the industry to be leaner with efficiencies.

Besides this fact an underlying reality is setting the trend to the industry that's been absence for some time. The correlation between oil producers profits with the oil price determined by the collusive monopoly in the market OPEC has begun to decouple as the rivalry between global competitive firms intensifies.  

Monday, 11 July 2016

Oil prices remain lofty as US suppliers add production

In Friday's blog I discussed a number of different commodities that were exhibiting signs of trendiness following a slump in prices that devastated the mining industry. Having said that the divergence between sectors within the commodities space made me draw on the conclusion that although many think a bottom may be in when speaking generally, there are a number of counters with signs of wariness attached to them.

One of those being the oil industry which hasn't found long term resolve between producers from opposite ends of the competitive line.  Although we've seen a staggering rally in prices this year, much of the move can be put down on the flexibility of US shale gas producers and considerable supply interruption from OPEC members.

What appears to be a stable market is gradually propelling existing producers in the US with halted production wells to have the propensity to turn open taps once again due to the lofty price levels being traded on market.

I recall observing the chart below a few weeks back and saying the disconnect between the price and US production was too large to believe a sustainability in the short term stating higher prices would coax suppliers back into the market. This pattern has been confirmed in the bottoming of operating US rigs increasing since May 2016.

To determine how willing producers are to start up production will become dependent on the level of support oil prices have at current prices. If we were to see a falter in demand it would immediately stop additional supply being brought to market however if demand continue to gobble up the leftover glut the International Energy Agency says exists fresh production could consolidate prices.

If the Brexit drama is anything to go by I think its safe to say politicians won't be affording attention to ensuring growth returns to the world economy but rather on saving an inevitably broken economic union from collapse. In order for oil to support current prices it needs consistent economic growth which isn't likely to occur anytime soon an in saying this I expect the vulnerability of oil prices to increase and pressure to mount until an eventual drop.    

Friday, 8 July 2016

Shifting dynamics in commodity markets

It would be fair to say that commodity prices in general have markedly improved their performance compared to previous years when prices sat in the doldrums and optimism sunk to new lows. The landscape of commentary surrounding these physical & intrinsically valued assets is changing shape with analysts starting to locate pockets of opportunities emerging from the ashes of a once admired sector.

Iron Ore

This commodity has much to prove in the coming months with the majority of news followers of this metal concluding that the glut in supply will remain as producers expand and refuse to budge on cutting back projects.

That'll be key in this sector but with the Chinese government demarcating steel production as an area of mass employment generation, it doesn't look likely we'll see the end of the surplus of steel inventory anytime soon.

Producers attempt to drive prices lower in an effort to force Chinese manufacturers to concede will be a time consuming process that'll result in additional supply flooding the market together with the condition the world economy finds itself in, it paints a pretty bleak picture.
Copper

On the opposite end we have copper that's experiencing a drain on inventory coupled with a time-collapse of planned projects that's halting the pace of the material reaching the surface. Combine these supply constraints with an avid pickup in demand from China and you have a recipe for recovery.

Mining companies were forced to slash projects due to a poor outlook with the one commodity that bore the brunt of this being copper. As a result the bounce that has materialised since the lows are seen as sustainable in forecasting the price in the near future.

I'm reasonably convinced the fundamentals present supports considerable upside potential going forward.


Silver

Much of the shine in gold has taken away from the superb rally seen in this commodity but has drawn the attention of pundits recently after surpassing previous highs last reached two years ago. The significant upward price moves are challenging the bearish sentiment built into this sector.

The reason behind the resurgence in price could be because of its affinity as a precious metal with gold producing similar upward surges related to uncertainty drifting into the market. If one had to make an assessment as to the probability of any of these economic negativities finding resolve soon, its likely we'll see a continued trend of investors finding refuge in precious metals.
Coal

Since I've extensively covered oil in previous articles I thought it would be a good idea to look within the energy sector away from the noise being created by price wars of oil producers.

Coal has built up a reputation as being the dirtiest and most pollutant energy used in generating electricity which has lead it to being the number one target of environmentalists and governments in eliminating carbon emissions that are subsequently affecting global warming.

Western governments have stepped up their attack on this commodity by implementing tax breaks to companies that use alternate fuels to generate electricity, namely natural gas, solar panels and wind turbines. This has hurt the material poorly as demand begins to taper off from the high outputs registered before such events.

Besides this the materials alternate use in the production of steel hasn't afforded it any favours. With this being said and the emergence of new technology that promotes the use of other less toxic products will ultimately weigh heavily on this commodity and I don't foresee much stability in the long term.

Thursday, 7 July 2016

Why gold will continue its impressive rally as the world economy falters

One of the best performing asset classes this year has to be Gold and with the global economic environment faltering at every step of the way its not surprising so many analysts are predicting a resilience in price over the next year given the outlook.

Although the receding nature of its price performance since reaching an all time high of $1911.60 in late 2011, the renewed ambitions of gold bulls has been sparked once more in the face of crisis with an impressive rally of over 30% gain year to date.

Bias in the yellow metal is further boosted by the troublesome position world central bankers find themselves in trying to reignite the embers of inflation that's dogged developed world economies for some time after the onset of the Financial Crisis in 2008.

Their collective efforts thus far have yet to yield the desired outcome most expected by world leaders who had envisioned a stronger foothold on their respective economies after a spiralling crisis had drained all decency from the pool of conventional policy that had been trusted for all these years. What they hadn't bargained on was the extensive use of monetary policy whilst ignoring the calamitous state of government debts would eventually uncouple artificialness from reality.

The first signs of trouble brewing came when China's economy failed to buoyantly recover from a slump in economic activity causing shockwaves throughout the global financial system, however if the expediency of "easy money" had truly done the trick to fix what had been broken then there was no need for alarm or so that's what politicians fronted.

Evidence began to show the world economy wasn't able and strong enough to withstand a contractionary event that occurred at a time when central banks hadn't even begun to consider lifting interest rates from their lowly existence.  
Momentum quickly drove up the possibilities of using negative interest rates as a tool that had only been implemented in smaller, open and more liberal countries such as Switzerland, Finland and Norway. It should be stressed that the positive effects from using such measure hadn't been recorded at the time when other larger economies decided to do the same.

Japan and the European Union have effectively become the poster boys for the policy with sentiment built in those regions leaning towards that thought with the US Federal Reserve being the only developed nation committed to normalisation of interest rates but as it turns out the pressure is mounting on them to reverse an initial decision to begin lifting and join the fray of sinking interest rates.

In the time before we reached this point, the market saw signs of the central banks stimulating their economies as a positive, now the opposite is true. The more stimulus measures are put in place the less convinced participants are becoming over the relevance of such event and more concerned about the ill consequences they will have which is why the sudden rush to gold.

The longer central banks hold off triggering off the inevitable and making governments more accountable for their policy inaction the more likely the demand for gold will rise because the market is becoming fearful that the usefulness of monetary policy has worn so thin that any further efforts will simply hold no weight in pushing things forward.  

Thursday, 9 June 2016

Oil prices might be strong but for how long?

Nobody can deny the resurgence of interest commodities have found this year with two of the standout cases being Gold and Oil. Both have underperformed in prior years but oil has managed to steal the attention of most market participants who were entertained and amused by the price wars initiated by OPEC on US shale gas producers.

Only last week we heard a presumptuous tone being struck by none other than de facto OPEC leader Saudi Arabia in a bid to smooth over cracks that have appeared prominently in recent months as a result of its autocratic manner in directing the collusive oil body over the last two years.

Riyadh's victory at all cost approach and one track mind focused on nothing besides destroying its US competitors has meant a number of OPEC members being inflicted with catastrophic economic circumstances that's produced shock into the system and weakened their abilities far beyond conventional means of repair.

Needless to say the vulnerability OPEC nations are experiencing is fully understood and felt by US shale gas producers who've received a similar barrage of doubt over their valuations and ability to pay down debt piles that have been accumulating. This kind of negative sentiment around US producers has afforded Saudi Arabia the chance of reinforcing the belief to its colleagues that it was right in its methods of eliminating competition of which it took full advantage of during the bi-annual OPEC summit held in Vienna last week.    
Digging deeper into the mechanics and events that led to oil prices almost doubling since the lows of January tells a different story though.

Indeed US shale gas producers were forced to turn off or temporarily close wells due to incurring losses and low prospects of witnessing long term stability in prices however the remaining producers who had survived holding off creditors knocking at the front door have done so because of their quickness to adapt to the situation better than their soured counterparts.

This has meant looking for alternate uses for shale gas apart from converting it into oil-based products for the motor industry that too went through its own crisis by almost reaching full storage capacity. Again this came down to producers attempting to hold out for as long as possible in anticipation of a price rise in oil that didn't materialise until now.  

Those producers who opted to produce liquefied natural gas (otherwise abbreviated LNG) haven't yielded the desired outcome they'd expect but they did alleviate the supply pressure on oil production globally by shifting its product into a new market.
The result???

A bounce in overall oil prices and a fresh supply glut formed in LNG markets who've been suffering the same fate as most commodity prices; battered, bruised and unloved. Given the pronounced resurgence in the commodity sector it suggests that this particular market might have to endure the troubles of a downturn a little while longer unless a way is found to clear the glut in place.

Considering oil prices have doubled in six months, the possibilities of increasing margins by opting out of producing LNG and reverting back into oil are too tempting for US shale gas producers to ignore.  Added that LNG closely tracks along the prices of oil yet in present times a divergence has developed by a far enough margin to push US producers to reconsider their end product, I wouldn't be surprised to see US production starting to grow once again.

This will result in pressure being applied to the oil price once again that'll contain the impressive rally we've witnessed so far and perhaps blow out the ember of hope many oil bulls may have had in believing that the current surge in prices characterizes an element of sustainability.

Short term product flexibility is the competitive advantage of US producers and I can't see why they wouldn't take control of that leaving Saudi Arabia with a fresh dilemma to deal with in proving that the assertion they made in implying their policies fixed the stability of oil prices rests on rickety foundations.

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Oil isn't only presenting an economic risk with its price decline

If you've been an avid reader of this blog you'd have noticed the topic of oil has come up often in my daily commentary with my belief that the development of this theme will not cease to exist for some time yet. I can recall commenting on the sudden drop in oil prices and subsequent bounce expressing my opinion that oil was a sector that would become a pool of interest in the next few years. Needless to say the commodity hasn't disappointed the skeptics who have been flooded with material to write about in their debates and arguments around its production.

Much of the focus this year has centred around the growing tensions between Saudi Arabia, the defacto leader of OPEC and its rival Iran who has recently been unshackled from international sanctions that prevented it from trading its most valuable product, oil, with the rest of the world.

However the last few days has seen that attention being taken away from the impending blow up of relations between both nations and directed towards supply interruptions that's seemingly fuelling (for a lack of the word) the price of oil in the last few weeks. We've seen the devastating wildfires in Canada halting a significant proportion of oil production due to the quickening pace with which the fire has spread that posed a risk of potentially huge damages if it reached oil fields but it looks as if authorities have got the situation under control.

Although the supply interruption from this event was grave enough to cause a spike in price, it's not the type of event that will be ongoing over the medium term. I stress this because if we are to see oil prices recover fully from the slump they've experienced we'll need to see a sustained situation that would support the price recovery.

In saying this and having closely followed the oil crises since its beginning in 2014, I've taken note of two important oil producers who were the first member nations in OPEC to make an appeal to Saudi Arabia to find resolve at the height of the plunge. Both Nigeria and Venezuela have borne the most economic damage following Saudi Arabia's decision to expand production in its efforts to push out US shale gas producers.

I've previously stated that if Saudi Arabia failed to get Iran to commit to an oil production freeze it could be seen as the former overlooking the defiance of the latter with the need for close cooperation being top priority when maintaining stability in a collusive agreement. The failure to do so would cause other nations to frown upon their weighting of views and possibly cause fissures between the relationship between OPEC and themselves.

This exact implication is what I believe to be happening in OPEC at the moment with both Nigeria and Venezuela stirring up fear amongst international investors over the economic dilemma each find themselves in with the outcome leading to oil production cuts.

Nigeria's cost curve means it requires higher prices to break even, a scenario that hasn't been present for some time. Together with this the added pressure of terrorist group Boko Haram's reign of villainous attacks on the Nigerian community in fighting for a wider acceptance of Muslim minority in the country.

However the problematic situation Nigeria finds itself in at present is as a direct consequence of suppressed oil prices, bleeding the country's foreign currency reserves to near zero causing economic despair as never seen before.

The change of guard in government is left stagnant in its progression as the new cabinet along with president Muhammadu Buhari grapple with a serious cash drain on fiscal accounts as most tax revenues are raised from oil income. Although tough talking in their way to winning the election, the party sits toothless in its defence against terrorism placing it on the back burner as higher priorities take precedent over everything else.  

But neglecting to defend its people, the country has become vulnerable to more terrorist attacks with the latest attacks taking aim at oil pipelines in an effort to sabotage the benefits of foreign receipts. The growing concern amongst the international community has led to a number of leaders, most notably the United States coming to the aid of Nigeria to stop the incursion of further attacks that could risk stability in the region.
Venezuela has had a long history of disrupting foreign investment into its oil sector being a nation that holds the world's largest reserves. The countries insistence of stated owned oil assets has led to oil production being poorly developed, an often cited argument in the debate over whether stated owned production is the right economic body in producing black gold in the country.

The country's reliance of oil as a means to raise government revenue is even greater than that of Nigeria translating into a detrimental impact on the economy when the price of oil exhibits shocks that can't be smoothed out. The situation on the ground has become so unbearable that fresh water is being rationed and electricity outages are a common occurrence as government tries in vain to get a hold on an epidemic atmosphere hanging over the country.

Similarity exists between Venezuela and Nigeria in foreign reserves having been depleted however the extent of the crises differs in that the Venezuelan government has restricted the access of dollars from importers coupled with price controls meaning mass shortages of basic necessities such as food, medicine and even toilet paper! The government's unwillingness to loosen its hold on the economy has meant that tensions are rising to a point where rumours of unseating president Nicolas Maduro have rooted themselves in the public as clashes with security forces increases on escalated agitation.
In concluding, one needs to consider not only the economic risk an uncertain oil environment presents to oil producers but also the political instability that becomes born into the economies whose over reliance and ill-equipped government policies lead their nations into economic distress. OPEC's relevance might be fading slowly with petty squabbles but its impact on smaller nations of which its own policies were suppose to uplift them is suddenly tearing them apart.

Monday, 9 May 2016

Saudi Arabian Prince Mohammed bin Salman reshuffles cabinet to shore up power

It was only last week that an Iranian deputy military commander warned off the US and its allies over an attacks on its kingdom saying it was prepared to close the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial gateway for oil produced in the Middle East to leave the region and delivered to the rest of the world, if it found their actions threatening in any way. These comments clearly sent a message of defiance to the West who've recently unshackled Tehran from years of sanctions.

I wrote an article last week Thursday expressing my opinion that Iran was harming the image of its nation in the international community by playing the contemptuous card in the actions and comments it made so early into its readmission. When the mention of "US and its allies" reached the ears of Riyadh, many knew that would be some sort of retaliation from the Arab Kingdom.

When asked last month what Saudi Arabia would do if Iran was unprepared to agree to freeze oil production along with other OPEC members, Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman stated that Saudi was ready and able to increase their production at any moment. He also went on to say that Riyadh had the capability of increasing its oil producing capacity to 20 million barrels a day if the kingdom decided on investing further in its oil sector.

These comments came as a threat to Tehran who subsequently didn't arrive at the oil summit in Doha, making up a well of excuses for its non-attendances but as it boils down we see this was a tactic by them to test Saudi's willingness to go forward with their own threats. The remarks made by an Iranian deputy military commander were simply a means to stir the provocation even more to measure the level of tolerance.

It didn't take long for Saudi Arabia to respond with the latest shake up causing analysts to stop and reassess the influence of the Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's power in matters relating to the economy of the kingdom.

Salman has fired prolific oil minister Ali al-Naimi who had served in his position for 21 years and replacing him with Aramco chairman Khalid al-Falih, showing his desire to take more control over the situation which is developing between themselves and Iran. The influential discretion afforded to al-Naimi in terms of his powers to formulate oil policy in Saudi Arabia and OPEC helped shore away the kingdoms conflict with other members in the Middle Eastern region namely Iraq and Iran.
However Salman's sweeping changes has shifted the perspective view on Saudi Arabia with many believing the 30 year old's aggressive approach could indicate a heightened and tense geopolitical situation building up that could possibly interrupt the supply of oil.

The Saudi prince has been tasked with transitioning his family's kingdom from an oil dependent nation into a more diverse economy reaping its benefits towards a greater number of sector, an immediate acknowledgement that the risk presented in the current oil market doesn't mitigate itself over the long term and the onset of alternative sources of energy provides a real threat to the industry.

Although Salman might be ambitious in his desires, the success of his plan will be the function of how well he is able to diverse the kingdom's reliance on oil into other sectors but at the same time retain control over OPEC so as to have a larger weighting on the direction of oil prices and thus more certainty during its transitive period.

Iran stands in the way of this presenting the prince with a problematic situation to deal with; if he allows Tehran to continue producing, the benefits that could be rendered from a unified cooperation would take longer because the deficits would consistently be cancelled out by the added production from Iran. One needs reminding that nothing stops Iran from going over and above its targeted production in its own ambitions to wrestle control away from Saudi Arabia, an outcome that could be disastrous for Riyadh as they'd no longer have discretion over direction.

Salman's thinking would be on par with a tit-for-tat playground attitude in the sense that if the Saudi kingdom can't get what it wants then no one will get anything, even if it means taking on financial strain in the process.

The prince knows that Iran is desperate to get back on track which is indicative from the enormous capital spend it's laid out in the area of air and rail transportation. This certainly doesn't stop here but the expansion of this program would require a healthy and stable climate in the oil market to emerge which is seeming unlikely given these turns of events.

This would be an incredible risk to take on after the kingdom admittedly suffered defeat at the hands of US shale gas producers by initiating the proposal to freeze production. There intention the last time round was to secure market share by squeezing out these new competitive players which hasn't worked.

I look at things this way, either Saudi Arabia is going to stamp its authority on the dominance oil or its going to end very badly for the Arab Kingdom. With the type of economic developments evolving in the world, I wouldn't think it would be appropriate to be taking on such a risk but only time will tell.  

Friday, 6 May 2016

Are there any signs of recovery in steel prices?

The global steel industry still remains in a mess after the world's biggest producer, ArcelorMittal reported another loss for the first quarter of 2016 citing lower steel prices and lack of demand for the continuation of the loss making trend. Although the losses are marginally smaller than last years first quarter numbers, the steadfast grip Chinese producers are having on the industry is becoming devastating to a point where producers such as ArcelorMittal and Tata Steel are actively lobbying governments for protection in an attempt to save the industry.

ArcelorMittal says that the recent spike in steel prices were welcomed but it remained uncertain whether the current price fluctuations were an indication of a stronger move for prices over the long term saying warily that it will continue to put measures in place to protect the company's financial position.

A striking feature that's often heard when discussing the future of iron ore and more so commodity prices is the lacklustre demand stemming from China who helped spur on a doubling of demand for steel in a relatively short period of time, lending hope to many mining producers that a ramp up in production of iron ore could reap considerable rewards in the years to come.

That motion of thought came to an abrupt end when signs of an impending Chinese economic slowdown started being felt by world markets coupled with the typical reluctant tone from executives defending their stance and investment. At the time China had been steadily producing its own supply of steel that provided the dual benefit of supplying the construction sector with a key product in the process of satisfying explosive demand coming from an expansionary infrastructure program that took aim at urbanising China but at the same time providing millions of Chinese workers with a means to earn an income from an industry known for mass job creation.

However Chinese steel production is not known to be the most cost effective which is why politicians decided to heavily subsidise the industry by bargaining that it played a much greater role in making Chinese citizens believe that its government was delivering on its promises rather than seeing it be driven by the profit motive.
The perfect brew of dilemma was stirring up and when the economic storm finally pulled into the Chinese economy, producers found themselves in a pickle of not being able to find buyers for an overinflated steel market even though they witnessed a considerable drop in prices prompting many to look towards the biggest consumer and contributor to the market, China, for answers.

It appeared that Chinese producers themselves could no longer rely on their own local demand to sell their produce and began selling into the global market causing a flood of supply and thus squeezing the margins of other producers to a bare minimum. The severity of the drop in the equity valuation of these steel producing companies indicated that the bubble had indeed popped and the need to re-assess was the next stage expected to take place.

We've seen a string of proposals by major steel producers in dealing with the problematic situation of haemorrhaging vital cash flow needed to keep these companies afloat however here's the next problem; if governments continue to prop up these loss making entities in an effort to save jobs, especially at a time when the global economic climate isn't on its best footing, the glut we continue to see will remain in place until the dynamics of supply and demand can resolve themselves without the intervention of other forces.

Added to this is the observation that producers are seeking protection rather than speaking of the benefits of government expansionary programs. This is because they've realised long time ago that the government's themselves are in their own dilemma and pushed into a tight corner where the space to maneuver is becoming smaller as the piles of debt left after a slew of stimulus measures aimed at reviving the world economy has failed to produce the optimal outcome.

One really needs to question the confidence of world leaders expectations when making an opinion on their comments about world growth in the future. If producers of a primary commodity used to signal the beginning of an upswing in economic growth aren't singing the same tune as those standing on the podium of promises, its time to step back and rethink the nature of the beast.

Monday, 18 April 2016

Saudi Arabia stands by its tough talk with no involvement from Iran

Oil producers were unable to agree on a deal in Doha that could've seen the production of the commodity frozen for a set period in an effort to lift prices that have traded near 12 year lows. The oil summit was called after Saudi Arabia along with Russia, Qatar and Venezuela proposed to freeze their production on condition that other producers including that of Non-Opec nations, did the same. This prerequisite came from the insistence of Saudi Arabia who's been at loggerheads with neighbours Iran who refuse to follow such a plan.

In an interview with Bloomberg last week, deputy crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud stated that the country wasn't willing to strike a deal without the involvement of Iran and should a deal not be agreed too the oil rich kingdom could immediately raise production to over 11.5 million barrels per day which would add even MORE supply to an oversupplied market.

As much spin as Tehran tries to put on the reasoning for their absence no doubt has been left that the real intention behind the nonattendance was to test Riyadh's threats of turning its back on a deal should their conditions not be met which is now clearly known.

But as much as Saudi has stood by what its said it does also paint a grim scenario for the price of Black Gold should they move ahead with plans to expand production aimed at crippling other producers and stamping their authority on the dominance of oil supply. Mohammed bin Salman was in an retortive mood when he hinted that his nation could increase production too as much as 20 million barrels per day if it invested considerable capital into the oil industry.
One thing is for certain and that is Saudi Arabia may have become alarmed by the emerging trend of bleeding foreign reserves to cushion the blow from lower oil prices however their stash hasn't been so badly affected that it causes those in charge to lie awake at night just thinking about it.

Iran is at a distinct disadvantage here while only having just been released from the shackles of sanctions from the international community. They'd need to see a higher oil price to benefit properly from the sale of their produce to be certain of repairing the economic damage caused through the years of non-inclusion in world trade.

But Saudi Arabia could suffer much more over the long term by making their allies believe that their interest in OPEC lies not in the common good of all members but rather on their own self-centred needs. In protecting their market share, Riyadh is showing the world that it's not willing to compromise its own dominance while asking others to do so with dire consequences attached to the lack of following instructions.

In the age of globalisation, world trade has grown stronger and ties between nation don't only depend on economic coordination as had been the case for many years. Money talks and so it walks when the deal no longer makes sense for both parties. Saudi's bullyboy tactics might stab at the short term benefits that could've been captured if Iran's detachment from the deal was overlook but the longer term implication hold a shaky ground for those who now see Saudi's dictatorial rule over OPEC as oppressive to economic prosperity.    

Thursday, 14 April 2016

The 3 players that matter the most in Doha oil talks

With three days left to go to the start of the much anticipated oil summit set to take place between OPEC and Non-OPEC producing nations held in Doha, most market participants remain skeptical that a long term positive outcome can be found when leaders sit down to discuss a possible oil production freeze.

I've been following the story since the middle of last year and have stated a number of times that a resolution to this matter will only be found when the biggest producers are the ones at the tail end of the economic damage which has slowly materialised. Up until a few months ago Saudi Arabia had remained steadfast in its decision to rid the market of alternative producers in the US by flooding the market with barrels of oil.

This initially worked with US shale producers feeling the pinch and responding almost immediately with closures of wells that couldn't break even as well as preparing for a financial storm that had been brewing over the levels of debt created in starting up these new ventures. However it didn't stop these producers from exploiting the richest wells with quantity aplenty to help them extend their stay in the oil market a little while longer and become a frustration to the Saudi's.

Added to this a new problem was slowly starting to emerge within the context of the entire world economy where the growth needed to stoke the coals of  the economic engine were found wanting with both the US and China letting up far more than would be necessary to nudge things forward.

Double whammy...

Having heard cries of help from other minor producers in OPEC, Saudi merely let those calls fall on deaf ears as they proceeded on but its placed them in a vulnerable position within the oil producing community. Saudi's efforts to curb its ill gotten plans that have backfired and put not only their well-being at jeopardy but the entire membership of OPEC, leaving them open to harsh reactions from those it failed to listen to.

This can't be a good footing to stand on when negotiating the stability of oil prices let alone a steady and consistent relationship amongst its peers in OPEC where co-operation from each party is an absolute necessity which is what we find with fellow member Iran.      
Iran's readmission into the oil market has dampened the outlook for the supposed Black Gold as the inventory of barrels stockpiled in Tehran is bound to be sold off to help aid an economy that's been economically isolated for a number of years.

However the relationship between Tehran and Riyadh hasn't been favourable at the best of times and the recent announcement by Saudi proposing a production freeze was met with a cold tone of defiance when Iran's oil minister was quizzed whether his country would be participating in such agreement. Tehran  had explicitly stated its objection to such a proposal before Saudi gave details of a possible way of halting the oil glut.

Sensing that Tehran could drag its heels, Saudi decided to find a better suited candidate that would give an extra notch of credibility to its plans to slow down the rate of oil production worldwide. Russia currently produces 10.9 million barrels per day marginally outstripping that of Saudi Arabia who is currently on 10.6 million bpd. Merging a plan together with both these players does add a degree of a no nonsense approach to the proposal but does it have the staying power to convince others?

Russia tactically got involved as it sees itself becoming a more prominent player in the oil market, possibly suggesting why the annexation of Crimea proved to be a hasty decision taken by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It's also got in on an oil deal with China that OPEC had hoped would've been swung its way but was beaten to the chase having devoting its attention to the oil price wars with the US.

But we should not forget that Russia's own economy has been crippled by the sanctions imposed on it from the West following the annexation of Crimea. Oil plays a significant role in providing much needed income in rebuilding the Russian economy and if Putin's ambitions are anything to go by don't expect anything less than astounding.
Since Saudi Arabia is seen as the leader of OPEC and possibly oil producers, their choice in strategy to freeze production as opposed to cut production was taken because they feels vulnerable of losing this status if it fails to play their cards properly which could see a hugely influential West losing its grip on oil supply since Washington and Riyadh hold close ties that sees a cordial understanding in keeping oil prices and production steady.

It's not a hidden secret that Iran has suffered from the economic sanctions imposed on it by the US and its dissatisfaction at the way Saudi Arabia has handled threats of new entrants to the oil market. Iran has capacity capable of meeting that of Saudi which would almost diminish the relevance of the latter should they chose to cut back production.

Russia on the other hand sees its ambition to play a more influential role on world politics as a priority with oil being strategic to this goal. It wouldn't miss an opportunity to circle a "wounded animal" so as to say when they see the pressure Saudi has come under in the waking months. Putin is too much of a political manoeuvrist to pass up such a chance to take power away from a controlling nation.

It's because of the above scenarios that I don't see the likelihood of a oil production freeze having an major impact on prices over the long term. The market remains critical and with profit margins being squeezed and debt hanging over the heads of management any significant jump in the price would yield an immediate flurry of selling from producers, pushing back the price from whence it came.

Wednesday, 13 April 2016

What Peabody Energy's filing for bankruptcy says for the future of coal?

The unprecedented comeback from world currencies and in particular emerging markets against the rampant strength of the US Dollar since the beginning of the year has laid the foundation for one of the biggest commodities price rallies since the end of the Financial Crisis. Together with a slight uptick in demand coming out of China, commodity prices have moved powerfully ahead to gain back lost ground after last years dismal performance.

But it's not with fading concern as the problematic debt crisis most producers find themselves in remains the bedrock of uncertainty amongst producers. We witnessed mining conglomerate Glencore becoming the bearer of bad news (or rather doomsday prophets) when they presented to shareholders a restructuring plan to cut down debt from abnormally high levels due to an inability to pay it back when considering the outlook of the mining sector.

This was followed by Anglo American Plc, BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and the likes all conceding to the output glut they had created in expecting resilient demand to stem from China that had fallen flat after a hard economic landing that still persists.

Although these bigger mining players may have weathered the storm at the height of its compounding panic, it was only a matter of time before we saw casualties submit to the often cruel aftermath of such an event. Yesterday's announcement that the world's biggest private coal producer, Peabody Energy Corp. had filed for voluntary bankruptcy drew a gasp of shock yet an expectant understanding that the inevitable that had been priced into most commodity producers had finally marked its presence in the sector.

Filing for voluntary bankruptcy, Peabody Energy might be able to preserve a company that's been in existence since 1883 but will need to re-think their pathway going forward as a result of an increasing competitive coal producing environment resulting in lower margins as well as a shift away from dirty energy to cleaner fuels.    
Most major commodities have experienced the same fate but coal has had the toughest out of all of them given the dual purposes it has in the production of other key products namely electricity and steel output. Both of these products are vital in providing a stable and concrete economy to grow from but an aspect that's been missing from the largest consuming nations of these products.

The US under the Obama administration has gone on a tireless drive to make the public aware of the harmful effects pollution has on the environment and in doing so has tightened the regulations for coal producers by implementing policy that require them to emit less emissions and providing tax breaks for suppliers of cleaner energy.

In China the demand for steel has dropped dramatically as government attempts to transition the economy from production oriented to consumer driven. This has had a profound impact on the price of metallurgical coal which is used in producing steel, another area of the sector that's been confronted with overcapacity and a gluttony of supply.

It's important to note that Peabody Energy had invested $5.1 billion into an Australian metallurgical coal mining company that's spelled the beginning of their disastrous performance following the declines in prices.  The company has indebted itself at a time when most in the industry had expected more on offer but got a lemon instead, however had the company been more diversified in its products perhaps it would've stood a better chance of survival as has been the case with the larger miners.

The company is a distinct player in the global coal production equation which begs the question over what the state of play might be for the commodity in the future. If the largest privately owned producer of coal is unable to steer things in the right direction, who has a chance to?

Indeed the price has a huge impact on profitability but the regulatory environment isn't going to fade away too quickly, especially after this event which would be considered a victory in the quest for cleaner energy. Government's around the world are increasing the momentum behind a global effort to curb carbon emission adding to the woes of these producers and making it harder for them to cream the profits that once were able to in the past.

Possible scenarios may take shape in the months ahead but I expect these bigger players to be swallowed up by the diversified producers whilst the smaller producers trickling out the market. What the industry needs now is a reinvention of itself with specific focus on other forms of energy besides coal. The future for energy lies in the way that consumes the least from non-renewable resources and aims at stretching the output of those renewables such as solar and wind to its fullest potential.


Coal, Australian thermal coal - Monthly Price - Commodity Prices - Price Charts, Data, and News - IndexMundi

Thursday, 17 March 2016

Oil producing nations to meet in Doha to discuss production freeze

Scouring through social media this morning my eye got a glance of an interesting chart that caught my attention with much thought over the developing situation happening in OPEC after selected members announced an output freeze. The chart in question is that of the Oil Volatility Index (OVX) spanning back to July 2014 when the rout began with an evident uptrend in place that surprisingly took a crucial step in defining a bottom for the commodity.

Although 2016 didn't start off on the best footing for oil we've seen a subsequent bounce following a number of developments happening from both OPEC and US shale gas producers. The responsiveness of US producers to a declining oil price can be seen in a stronger trend downwards in the number of wells in operation. A significant part of the uncertainty stirred up last year surrounded the ability of firms to service the debt they had accumulated during their expansionary phase years earlier.

This risk remains on the table even though with every dollar the price inches upward deep sighs of relief can be heard, troubling signs that renewed oil strength might encourage producers with stagnate wells to once again begin turning on their taps negating any positiveness found in this current rally.

Then you have to consider the ructions happening inside OPEC concerning members acceptance to bring about a production freeze that's been agreed upon so far by Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Qatar and non member Russia in an effort to curb quantities being delivered to market. However there's been heavy disinterest in partaking in this endeavour from Iran due to sanctions being recently uplifted added to the already fractiousness relationship between Tehran and Riyadh.

In saying this we cannot neglect to note the significance of this turning point of volatility in oil price, it's something that might suggest that the developments around these issues are starting to produce positive sentiments from market participants who feel a little more confident than what they were three months ago.
News of a meeting between major oil producers from both ends of the spectrum next month helped spur the market on indicating Saudi's preparedness to sidestep Iran in its quest to see higher oil prices. Such a meeting if concluded successfully would all but seal the fate for oil and there's a desperate need from both sides to see some sort of stability.

By including Non-OPEC members Saudi Arabia has conceding to the fact that oil competitors are here to stay for the long term, a scenario it had refused to envision by implicitly driving up oil output to eliminate these high cost producers. This plan has resulted in the Arab oil empire haemorrhaging extensive government leverage only to see it fail miserably.

For US shale gas producer this might be the lifeline they were looking for and would do well to see some conclusive deal reached if they're wanting to succeed over the long term. They would need to stress urgency in the execution of such a deal as time is running out for them as cash flows tightening further and creditors coming knocking at the door.

Overall I think the world consumer may have not participated as much in this current price decline as one would've expected due to the strong dollar amongst all the world's currencies. It can also be said that the effects of lower oil prices on US consumers haven't economic growth either with many begging the question, what will happen next?

Wednesday, 9 March 2016

Resurgence in commodities are only short term in nature

Colossal; the best way one would be able to describe the movements that's been witnessed in mining counters over the past year with the present bounce making no exceptions when pulling off hair raising moves that would frighten even the most experienced trader. The perception around this relief rally is that it was a response to a rather dramatic selldown and should only to temporary.

I found this chart tweeted by the World Economic Forum which shows the net exports/imports of various nations around the world in terms of commodities as a percentage of GDP. The resource abundant countries make up the usual supply force that determine the amount of quantities available to the market however the most interesting shades on the geographical chart are those that are resource dependent or otherwise the part of the market that stimulates demand for quantities.

The most distinctive areas that we are able to identify are countries such as the United States of America, Japan, Europe and China. I have mentioned these countries specifically for a reason because if we think about the economic commentary that's dominating the news flow currently we'd find that all these countries are suffering from economic inaptness.

Japan and Europe have both implemented negative interest rates that has the world flummoxed about whether these extents to monetary stimulus is either a hinderance or a necessity to the financial system. The inability to abate a deflationary price environment has meant that central bankers are pressured to pick up demand or face dealing with an inactive economy that refuses to budge.

China has gotten stuck in a transitory state between transferring between that of an industrial based economy to a consumer services oriented economy. Investors are hopeful that government may indicate that it intends on lending a helping hand to the economy that has stumbled along but the role of government is slowly diminishing as increasing debt piles continues to prevent them from executing radical infrastructure programs that would boost the economy.

The US looks like the only nations that has the capability to steer the world economy in the right direction however if we look at economic indicators being reported they would suggest less than needed activity showing that it may not be the saving grace the world's looking for.      
All these nations have pertinent issues that trouble their outlook but more so the fact that each one has been place in a trend of slowing economic activity at the same time makes for a bigger implication for the global outlook as a whole.

We've seen commodity stocks radically improving after last years onslaught brought on by supply glut fears however the rally that has evolved does not feel as if there is a steady trend of long term buyers entering the fray but rather that of a short squeeze. It would be dangerous to think that we've seen the end of a disastrous time for commodity stocks because there remains issues yet to be resolved.

Iron ore prices spiked 19% on Monday 7th March 2016 to record the largest one day jump ever but Australia's steel trade port was shut down due to a hurricane that halted operations together with a bolstering demand for steel following the end of holidays in China have all played a part in helping prop up prices in the short term however a supply glut looks likely to remain in place for the next 2-3 years if demand doesn't pick up significantly.

Oil remains a key component in deciphering any direction. With OPEC on its knees and shale gas producers drowning in debt, its quite evident we are far from the resolution required to allow prices to begin its ascent.

Then there's the big issue of debt that seems to be haunting many mining producers. Although fears may have faded for the time being, the increase in commodity prices we've seen so far this year isn't sufficient to generate cash flow to pay away these liabilities quickly enough to chase away credit ratings agencies from downgrading them further. While the market has become intoxicated with optimism they've forgotten these issues that haven't gone away.

Before we see a return of investors in the mining sector companies will need to show steady demand for its products and with supply gluts on the scale we've seen so far as well as the lack of response to stimulus measures from the four nations I mentioned above I don't envision seeing this happening anytime soon.

Thursday, 3 March 2016

BHP Billiton lands a settlement that unlocks certainty again

Mining giants BHP Billiton and Vale have signed an agreement with the Brazilian government to cover the damages incurred after a tailings dam wall burst in the province of Minas Gerais late last year that left 19 people dead and many more displaced. The settlement will occur over a period of 15 years with contributions from both joint partners as well as mining company Samarco. The agreed upon settlement value came in at 20 billion reais ($5.1 billion) a figure lower than what was expected in months preceding the agreement.

A relief for BHP Billiton who faced a barrage of attacks from environmentalists over the long term impact such a disaster would cause for the region, the company has promptly closed this eerie chapter of its history escaping this event with a few grazes in what could've been a financially draining exercise as has been seen in the past with the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico that proved detrimental.

With management having wrapped up a settlement it is now able to focus on its core business instead of concentrating on containment of further damages materialising. It can be said that the Brazilian government having been under severe economic strain mostly due to the downturn in commodity prices, the company got away lightly considering that the disaster was the worst mining catastrophe in Brazilian history.

But this is not the end of the tale for the world's biggest miner as its commitment to the communities of Minas Gerais is vital in building up its reputation as a mining company that cares for the lives of those it impacts upon as well as delivering profits to its shareholders, a balance which is often contested in the media but an important balance that sets it apart from its competitors.

Through clear strategic planning, management has been able to steer the company through a difficult period where scrutiny was at its highest and brought the company's focus back into line with where it wants to be headed too. If one looks at the wobbly backdrop that commodity producers have been faced with over the past two years, this current outcome showcases the value edge an investor would attain if the investment choice was based purely on management credentials and abilities, an aspect one needs to pay particular attention to when looking for good value at the extremes of pessimism.