Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oil. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 March 2017

Oil prices fall as supply continues its upward march

OPEC's plan to unravel years of price drops in oil markets is turning sour as a decrease in production has seen a temporary upward shift in prices, only to be thrown back down by the risk appetite of US producers who've subsequently opened it's abundant supply tap once more. 

As the evidence starts to overwhelming mount in support of additional cuts in production, the sturdiness of conviction by Saudi Arabia in terms of the level it expects to cuts erodes with every fresh report to be released.       

Graph courtesy of Bloomberg
The major US shale gas suppliers who managed to mitigate the headwinds of the price turmoil are eagerly looking for their reward which would go a long way to paying down the debt incurred during the uncertain period that's seemingly holding back good profits.

This will only serve to make the rebalancing process more complex than what it's put across due to the constant stop start motion of the US suppliers and possibly other global producers looking to deplete the surplus on hold.

Whichever way price turns to in the future we'll only know it's capability and trait once the voluminous stock is cleared, a situation that's far from over ...

Monday, 7 November 2016

In the News Today

US Elections set for a tight race with Clinton tipped the favourite

Hardly anyone can say that the run up to this year's US Presidential Election hasn't lived up to the lively expectations it promised when candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties started their campaigns months ago in a race to the White House with the contest reaching it's conclusive end heading into election day tomorrow.

But away from the low blows and side swipes handed to one another, come Wednesday after the results have been announced a victory celebration will be short lived as the real work begins in earnest with the inheritance of the current Obama Administration's issues of difficulty handed over to the next in line.  

Be it as it may the priority of the economy needs to take centre stage as the steadiness of the global outlook looks ever more uncertain in an environment of low to no inflation and negative interest rates coupled with lacklustre growth. The key for either Clinton or Trump will be a revival of confidence in the direction of the world economy which is largely influenced by the policy's set in the US.
Rejection of Chinese Deals raises doubts

As questions begin to mount over the benefits of globalisation, stats showing the rejection of proposed acquisitions of foreign companies by Chinese firms is headed for it's highest level since 2009 helping critics of the system point out another flaw in its uses as an economic regime amongst nations.

The most scrutinising nations include the United States and Germany whose policymakers both handed heavy blows to the aspiration of Chinese investors by stopping big deals dead in their tracks which could imply restrictive access to investing or a protection of sovereignity.
Potential stockpile disruption could see oil prices spike

 A 5.0 earthquake in the town of Cushing, Oklahoma has pushed worries over the disruptions of oil supplies in the US as authorities attempt to verify the extent of the damaged caused near one of the world's largest oil storage facilities that has the potential to shut off thousands of gallons of fuel reaching end users.

However fears might be short lived as OPEC continues to battle infighting amongst its members heading into the second and final bi-annual meeting of 2016 due to be held at the end of November in which speculators had hoped would yield a positive outcome for the decline of oil production.

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

OPEC impasse offers the least worry to oil price gains

The prospective of oil prices delivering further on an establishment of a rebound is starting to wane as oil producing nations find it difficult to figure out ways to compromise one another in exchange for higher price levels.

This after an informal meeting held in Vienna over the weekend by OPEC members which included a number of Non-OPEC nations such as Russia failed to yield the desired agreements that are needed to be in place ahead of OPEC's final bi-annual meeting of 2016 set to be held on the 30th November 2016.

Having failed to reach an accord in April this year, OPEC endless divisions on how to implement production cuts that'll be able to embed sustenance into the existing trend have largely gone unnoticed until now where we beginning to see oil traders becoming skeptical over the chances of a deal being struck anytime soon.
Furthermore the recovery in oil prices has seen the viability of alternative producers increase tremendously indicating that the effort needed to see real price gains is clearly stacked up against the meager endeavours of OPEC which is why the decision by Non-OPEC nations to join the discussion over possible agreements was a huge catalyst for OPEC to solve its own problems and not fear it's own attempts to manage the price mechanism would dissolve it's market share to competitors.

But the impasse in OPEC that seemingly keeps regurgitating itself is providing reason for Non-OPEC nations to become disinterested in it's plans and thus a continuation of an oversupplied market which ultimately leads to a stalemate in price levels. The situation isn't helped by the state of the global economy that's battling to find traction in a difficult environment of negative interest rates coupled with deflation.

Here's the thing; Oil producers need to accept that demand isn't going to stimulate growth for a very long time and the best path to follow is finding efficiency rather than relying on demand to fund the outlay of mega expansions.

Hard to accept, difficult to swallow but straight to the truth if the world cannot consume the current supply of oil daily why is there a need to bring more to the surface?

Friday, 2 September 2016

Russia's voice in the oil debate is vital for progress

Up until early August, much of the excitement around the resurgence of oil prices this year had been lost after market participants began noticing cracks in the sustainability of the moves citing OPEC members being at loggerheads with each other over the exclusion of Iran from a deal that looked set to freeze the production of oil.

Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of OPEC, insisted on their inclusion saying Iran might use the opportunity to gain market share that could erode the position of other members but mainly itself. Iran countered by saying it had been sanctioned from trading its oil with the rest of the world and was in the process of mending its trade balance that had suffered badly as a result.  

The dispute between the two threw the power of OPEC into jeopardy by opening the door to retaliatory attacks against one another with Riyadh going as far to say to would increase oil output to record highs in a veiled threat intended to undermine Tehran.

But along came Russian oil minister Alexander Novak who suggested his country was open to revisiting the prospects of negotiating a production freeze after a meeting held in April between them and OPEC members fell through leaving producers in limbo. Novak said OPEC could possibily use an upcoming informal meeting between members to discuss the way forward.
This revived up the bulls although only for a little while as the bickering flared up with Saudi Arabia proudly announcing it had reached an all time high in oil production for the month of July. The on and off commentary that's been swirling around since Novak made the comments has driven uncertainty off balance and dissuaded participants from taking a view on either direction.

However things look set to get interesting with Russian president Vladimir Putin adding his voice to the debate and throwing his weight behind reaching a deal without the inclusion of Iran. He went further to express empathy for Tehran saying the country has increased oil production from a low base and the effects of generating profits through oil revenue would be an added boost to its economy.

I've stated previously in the past that Saudi Arabia had abused its position in OPEC to suit its own economic needs while overlooking the distress in of others inside the group and it's bullyboy tactics threaten to tear apart the organisation with the possibilities of members "cheating" on the agreement to see higher oil prices.

Needless to say, Russia's support for Iran gives confidence to those who are of the belief that a production freeze is likely because it pits two giant oil producing nations against one another without creating conflict within the organisation. Russia may not form part of OPEC but the combination of their supply with that of OPEC equates to roughly 50% of the world's oil supply. Their participation in the deal is an absolute necessity for both OPEC and themselves.

And in saying this, Moscow can't afford to slip back on the economic work its done in alleviating the hardship suffered from its own sanctions imposed by the West after it annexed Crimea. Optimally it would benefit greatly if oil prices sat above $60 yet we still need to see them retain those levels with a degree of certainty that they'll stay above there.  

A leader as powerful as Putin weighing in on the debate highlights the urgency of finding resolve in the current environment.

Wednesday, 17 August 2016

Saudi Arabia showing signs of economic distress with low oil prices

The instability of oil prices in the last two years has meant bad times for many countries, especially those who are reliant on OPEC to interfere with the supply dynamics, suffering grave economic consequences as a result of lower but much needed revenue streams.

Chief culprit in the deliberate cascade of surplus oil finding its way into a demand-waning market has been Saudi Arabia whose steadfast conviction in budging out fresh competition cannot be discounted from the levels its gone to in ensuring difficulty for the newcomers entering a state of profitability.

However this hasn't come without cost as the world's largest exporter of oil has used its de facto position as leader of OPEC to influence market dynamics most often to the detriment of all parties involved in the collusive agreement with the economic pinch now hurting Saudi's fiscal budgetary plans that lie in jeopardy.    
Probably the biggest reason for the US having a propensity to seek out alternative forms of energy stemmed directly from the fluctuant state of affairs in most OPEC countries that's dictated supply to the rest of the world meaning less control by external forces.

In turn Saudi Arabia and many of its counterparts have used the abundance of this scarce commodity as a strategic resource used to distribute prosperity to its citizens instead of allowing the free market to concentrate the wealth in the hands of a few greedy individuals. As commendable as this societal approach might sound it requires a domineering government administration which on most occasions involves a suppression of its citizens instead of their liberation.

Such has been the case in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia where its citizens have been fed with state benefits for many a decade in exchange for implicit support for its monarch. But this understanding is coming under threat as the war on oil price heats up and the longevity of extensive means of action in place extended further into the future than intended.

The flummoxed leaders of Saudi Arabia hadn't bargained for the length of time needed to eliminate competition, a goal that's hardly given any relief to the flourishing inventory of oil sitting in storage. Just last week I wrote a piece detailing Riyadh's efforts to fight back at US shale gas producers and went on to say that its plan had lost the definition of being a short term dilemma and had begun moving into the realms of longer term risks disturbing the forced order.  

Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the youthful deputy crown prince and second in line to the throne has been vocal about his radical plan to shape Saudi Arabia from its over reliance on oil as a main component in its economy to a more diversified spread of sectors as a bold change needed to secure its future although his arrogance and lack of diplomacy regarding leniency to fellow OPEC members in recovering economically from a global trade hiatus (the member being Iran) hasn't won him over many friends.

Backed into a corner, Salman needs to tread the waters carefully so as to not upset the kingdom's standing with its people but at the same time wastefully spend its time fighting a price battle that will presumably end up with the free market gaining some sort of control over oil supplies. If he isn't successful in convincing Saudis of his grand plan the country could very well see unrest descend into its streets and the power of the monarch stripped from its existence.

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Is Saudi Arabia up to its old tricks again?

When the thought of oil returning back into bear territory became too good to be true, the Russian Energy minister Alexander Novak swooped in to rescue deflated expectations by coyly suggesting that his nations were open to negotiations if fresh talks were to begin regarding the issue of oil production freezes but went on to say that elevated prices would likely provide producers with relief rather than resolve at this current time.

Prices immediately rose on the news with many speculating that OPEC might use an upcoming informal meeting to be held in September to thrash out the possibilities of it happening with intentions of finding a better approach  dealing with the matter than they had done previously when not all members, namely Iran, could be drawn to agreeing to conditions set down.
But the prospects of this occurring in the not so distant future fell faster than a stone in water after de facto OPEC leader Saudi Arabia announced with much pleasure it had pumped out a record amount of oil for which it says was intended to cater for an increase in summer demand in the Middle East.

Riyadh may think this limp excuse may be useful in misleading the oil market relating to a downturn in prices where concerns have raged over demand being outstripped by abundant supply by falsely believing oil prices have bottomed, it does more to show the factionalism that cuts deep within the organisation following a series of disagreements as to the course of action needed to fight new competition.

This kind of statement that's hurriedly found its way into the news promptly after Alexander Novak comments of a possible freeze indicates Saudi Arabia's true feelings towards the issue. If it were to be brought up again it'll refuse to acknowledge a problem as it had done prior to its involvement that happened only because the Arab kingdom's finance's had suffered drastically as a result of the slump.

It's clear that Saudi Arabia's plan to rid the oil market of US shale gas producers is not one it sees itself warding off in the short term but rather a much  bigger threat that necessitates the argument for continuous attacks aimed reducing the profitability of their ventures, the most profound strategy being a deliberate effort to flood the market with cheap oil.

The news shouldn't be seen on the face value of it but rather a signal that tensions are rising amongst OPEC members again and possibly an indication that we'll see weak oil prices going into the end of the year.

Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Technical Tuesday: Royal Dutch Shell PLC.

Monthly 


Firstly it must be noted that the stock chart used in this article derives its price from the Euronext stock exchange denominated in Euros. The reason why I've highlighted this aspect is because this stock is a multinational corporation with several listings elsewhere including the London and New York Stock Exchanges which would price the shares in the respective countries currency. 

In saying this by analysing the stock in Euros you might not yield the same sentiment if priced in another currency due to the relativeness of each currency to one another. 

Looking at the chart we see price has been stuck in a sideways motions within a considerably wide range over the last number of years. I've excluded the use of moving averages from it as the whipsaw movement of price would make the indicator ineffective. 

The price shows a strong correlation with general price movements in global equities up until 2014 when the price of oil peaked. The uptrend, marked in green, remained in place from its origins in 2009 to its failed attempt to break pass the previous high last set in 2007 which admittedly had the hallmarks of a trend with vigorous ability to set the outlook higher.    

However what we've seen afterwards is an unexpected failure coupled with a flurry of buyers scrambling to exit positions with the resultant outcome of the price reaching support marked out at the bottom of 2009 in relative quick succession with an exceedingly strong move off the lows that ended the slump.  

Lastly the RSI has breached underneath the 50 level suggesting momentum favouring the sellers. To add further evidence to this belief I've circled an area on the indicator where it tried to surpass the mark yet failed leaving behind trails of optimism. 

Daily 


In contrast to the monthly I've attached moving averages to the Daily over a period of one year as we've seen a great deal of swaying in the price. Immediately noticeable is the bounce off the lows registered in January following the sudden change in view regarding the supply & demand dynamics in the oil market. 

Although a distinct trend can be seen the distance between subsequent retests is far too long to establish any real threat to the downtrend which is why I classified the upward motion a bounce rather than an uptrend. 

This has caused the price trend to become vulnerable to heavy selloffs that have occurred in the last two weeks.  The ease with which price sliced down past the trendline indicates the sellers are still dominant in the current market environment. 

Added to this is a potential Head & Shoulder formation that normally appears at the end of a strong up move. The right shoulder has yet to form but judging by the position of the stochastic indicator, there's still space for price to move upwards before it gets into overbought territory. 

If price were to fall below the 200 day moving average (blue line) the sellers would take full advantage and commit an attack on the buyers that could inflict damage to their hope filled mindsets. 

Friday, 5 August 2016

US oil industry still bothered by debt piles

As the pick up in shale gas producers filing for bankruptcy grips oil production in the US a new concern is starting to emerge over the indebtedness of "Big Oil" after numbers suggest these firms have steadily become reliant on using cheap money to satisfy dividend payments to stockholders.

The distressed nature of the oil industry is such that firms need to see higher prices to be confident of obtaining the bounteous offerings the sector once gave to investors. However with the stability of oil supply becoming irregular following OPEC's commitment to disrupt new competition as well as the limited economic growth expected globally, one wonders if the optimism that's re-entered the prospects of the oil market might've stretched further than practicality.

When considering all commodity prices came under severe pressure over the last two years due to a larger than expected economic contraction from China, big oil firms were better placed relative to major mining players in terms of their balance sheets which can't be denied given the resounding margins made when oil prices sat at lofty levels close to $100.

In the article below it's suggested that oil majors could be forced into restructuring their books with the swells of debt growing by the year. If this were to happen on the scale we've seen happen with global miners it would most definitely shape up the industry to be leaner with efficiencies.

Besides this fact an underlying reality is setting the trend to the industry that's been absence for some time. The correlation between oil producers profits with the oil price determined by the collusive monopoly in the market OPEC has begun to decouple as the rivalry between global competitive firms intensifies.  

Monday, 11 July 2016

Oil prices remain lofty as US suppliers add production

In Friday's blog I discussed a number of different commodities that were exhibiting signs of trendiness following a slump in prices that devastated the mining industry. Having said that the divergence between sectors within the commodities space made me draw on the conclusion that although many think a bottom may be in when speaking generally, there are a number of counters with signs of wariness attached to them.

One of those being the oil industry which hasn't found long term resolve between producers from opposite ends of the competitive line.  Although we've seen a staggering rally in prices this year, much of the move can be put down on the flexibility of US shale gas producers and considerable supply interruption from OPEC members.

What appears to be a stable market is gradually propelling existing producers in the US with halted production wells to have the propensity to turn open taps once again due to the lofty price levels being traded on market.

I recall observing the chart below a few weeks back and saying the disconnect between the price and US production was too large to believe a sustainability in the short term stating higher prices would coax suppliers back into the market. This pattern has been confirmed in the bottoming of operating US rigs increasing since May 2016.

To determine how willing producers are to start up production will become dependent on the level of support oil prices have at current prices. If we were to see a falter in demand it would immediately stop additional supply being brought to market however if demand continue to gobble up the leftover glut the International Energy Agency says exists fresh production could consolidate prices.

If the Brexit drama is anything to go by I think its safe to say politicians won't be affording attention to ensuring growth returns to the world economy but rather on saving an inevitably broken economic union from collapse. In order for oil to support current prices it needs consistent economic growth which isn't likely to occur anytime soon an in saying this I expect the vulnerability of oil prices to increase and pressure to mount until an eventual drop.    

Thursday, 23 June 2016

Is oil showing signs of fatigue after an impressive rally?

Although oil prices has impressed many this year with a spectacular comeback from decade lows to a phenomenal rally that equated to almost a doubling of price in less than six months, its no wonder a close eye has been stalking price action of late as it nears medium term resistance that some believe could offer a harsh reality check for oil bulls.

Part of the reason we've seen a spike in price is due to the fact that US shale gas producers responded hastily when reasonable thought proved harmful in believing a rebound in price was nearer than fully understood in the dynamics leading down the value.  Needless to say the added economic deterioration in a number of OPEC member nations helped spur on a resurgence that's outshone returns of yesteryear.

We now have a scenario where oil prices are lofty enough to fulfill breakeven or even profit-making criteria for US suppliers to justify opening taps up again which is proving to be the case as found in the article below posted by the Economist.

 I've been saying this for a number of weeks combined with the price stalling at critical levels it could suggest that this sentiment is gaining traction amongst oil traders with a relative balance between buyers and sellers in the weeks gone past from a state where buyers far outstripped sellers driving up prices.  
As this is said further evidence shows that finance institutions that were once happy to accept the Cinderella prospects fed to them from producers seeking funding are stepping away from the market of lending to this sector with largely exposed European bankers opting to strave off capital hungry borrowers by refusing to issue new debt or alternatively finding buyers for these loans that have taken on additional risk.

What does this tell us?

It says European banks don't foresee the same optimal outcome that featured in the reason to grant long term borrowings to oil producers but instead of holding ground and patiently wait for the usual cycle to correct itself, this theory no longer stands as these institutions see harsher consequences if they were to hold these debt instruments for anytime longer otherwise why would they be selling?

To go further it also adds momentum to those who believe US shale producers will restart operations and possibly cause prices to slump again. The fact that European banks are doing this now paints the extreme optimism given to the situation.

Where does it leave us?

Quite simply the oil market will be left in a volatile oil market that will continue to exhibit wild movements in price until stability is found but even this is uncertain as of now. The flexibility of shale gas producers mean suppliers are able to shift between markets in search of profitable returns making equilibrium dependent on the surplus/deficit of either chosen produce.

Thursday, 9 June 2016

Oil prices might be strong but for how long?

Nobody can deny the resurgence of interest commodities have found this year with two of the standout cases being Gold and Oil. Both have underperformed in prior years but oil has managed to steal the attention of most market participants who were entertained and amused by the price wars initiated by OPEC on US shale gas producers.

Only last week we heard a presumptuous tone being struck by none other than de facto OPEC leader Saudi Arabia in a bid to smooth over cracks that have appeared prominently in recent months as a result of its autocratic manner in directing the collusive oil body over the last two years.

Riyadh's victory at all cost approach and one track mind focused on nothing besides destroying its US competitors has meant a number of OPEC members being inflicted with catastrophic economic circumstances that's produced shock into the system and weakened their abilities far beyond conventional means of repair.

Needless to say the vulnerability OPEC nations are experiencing is fully understood and felt by US shale gas producers who've received a similar barrage of doubt over their valuations and ability to pay down debt piles that have been accumulating. This kind of negative sentiment around US producers has afforded Saudi Arabia the chance of reinforcing the belief to its colleagues that it was right in its methods of eliminating competition of which it took full advantage of during the bi-annual OPEC summit held in Vienna last week.    
Digging deeper into the mechanics and events that led to oil prices almost doubling since the lows of January tells a different story though.

Indeed US shale gas producers were forced to turn off or temporarily close wells due to incurring losses and low prospects of witnessing long term stability in prices however the remaining producers who had survived holding off creditors knocking at the front door have done so because of their quickness to adapt to the situation better than their soured counterparts.

This has meant looking for alternate uses for shale gas apart from converting it into oil-based products for the motor industry that too went through its own crisis by almost reaching full storage capacity. Again this came down to producers attempting to hold out for as long as possible in anticipation of a price rise in oil that didn't materialise until now.  

Those producers who opted to produce liquefied natural gas (otherwise abbreviated LNG) haven't yielded the desired outcome they'd expect but they did alleviate the supply pressure on oil production globally by shifting its product into a new market.
The result???

A bounce in overall oil prices and a fresh supply glut formed in LNG markets who've been suffering the same fate as most commodity prices; battered, bruised and unloved. Given the pronounced resurgence in the commodity sector it suggests that this particular market might have to endure the troubles of a downturn a little while longer unless a way is found to clear the glut in place.

Considering oil prices have doubled in six months, the possibilities of increasing margins by opting out of producing LNG and reverting back into oil are too tempting for US shale gas producers to ignore.  Added that LNG closely tracks along the prices of oil yet in present times a divergence has developed by a far enough margin to push US producers to reconsider their end product, I wouldn't be surprised to see US production starting to grow once again.

This will result in pressure being applied to the oil price once again that'll contain the impressive rally we've witnessed so far and perhaps blow out the ember of hope many oil bulls may have had in believing that the current surge in prices characterizes an element of sustainability.

Short term product flexibility is the competitive advantage of US producers and I can't see why they wouldn't take control of that leaving Saudi Arabia with a fresh dilemma to deal with in proving that the assertion they made in implying their policies fixed the stability of oil prices rests on rickety foundations.

Thursday, 2 June 2016

Will Saudi Arabia's gesture of goodwill be received well by OPEC?

OPEC's bi-annual meeting kicked off today in Vienna with market participants not expecting any specific resolution to be passed after the previous two meetings drove divide between members that deemed the collusive oil body defunct at controlling the price of oil.

At the head of the division is de facto leader Saudi Arabia whose steadfast conviction in its belief that a lower oil price would drive away competition from new entrants that found opportunity in the US in the form of shale gas. However the voice of concerns from other economically vulnerable members it tried to brush aside is coming back to haunt it with the latest meeting demarcated as crucial if it wishes to amend broken ties that have the potential to unseat Riyadh as a major influence in the oil market.

The obvious casualties have been Venezuela and Nigeria who were the first to propose an emergency meeting called before the planned December 2015 conference appealing to Saudi Arabia to pull back from the current stance due to the harmful effects it was having on both their economies. It was even suggested that Russia join the meeting in a hope that the combined effort that totals roughly half the world's oil output would drive the desired move in the price of oil most members wished to see.

These pleads fell on deaf ears as Riyadh was firm on its decision, the first signs of the fractious relationship showing cracks within the organisation. At the time I had said Saudi Arabia was risking the economic prosperity of its member countries in favour of its own agenda and the result would likely cause involuntary political uncertainty due to headwinds faced by lower oil prices that only served to exacerbate a difficult economic burden on their citizens.

As developments have taken shape since that failed meeting in December, the turmoil has grabbed hold of both countries and as predicted, political instability has given rise to heightened risk by investors who put fate in their chances in those countries. This has left a considerable amount of acrimony in the aftermath of crippled economies whether or not both these nations try to veil their ill-feelings to hide signs of disunity.

Vulnerability of alliances is what will press Riyadh to relook at its diplomatic position over the last year of dealing with OPEC members with this case being the perfect example of how strong bonds may turn into weak reliances if every nation's expectations aren't met leaving the door open to possible promises being made by other ambitious members, namely Iran.
Which brings me to the next contentious issue inside OPEC right now and that's the rife between Saudi Arabia and Iran with the latter refusing to participate in an agreement that would see oil output frozen for a set period of time. The refusal comes after the Arab nation was unshackled from trade sanctions that prevented it with selling it's most popular product, oil, to other countries in Europe and the US, the bulk of its customers.

Being unable to lift output during times of sanction, Iran feels its done enough for OPEC to warrant its exclusion from the deal which it sees as a hindrance to its economic recovery rather than a benefit. Notwithstanding this argument Riyadh has come out strongly against its non-compliance saying it will not agree to any plans unless Tehran is seated at the same table and reciprocates causing immense tension between the two.

But once again, Saudi Arabia fails to take into account the economic misgivings of other member nations and instead places its own prosperity in front of everyone else. The trend of continually overlooking economic dilemma's without any sympathy is starting to paint them as dictatorial in their rule of the collusive agreement which is bound to come under some sort of resistance now or in the future.

It's effort to smooth over ties at the current meeting won't yield much more than a mere acknowledgement of a gesture but it certainly doesn't undo the calamitous outlook some of its members face because of its arrogance. Recent comments made by the deputy crown prince Mohammed Bin Salman Al Saud would certainly speak to the contrary when looking for genuineness of extending a hand of goodwill when you weigh up his threats to drastically increase Saudi's oil production to undercut Iran's plans to expand its own production from record lows.

The timing of the move should be scrutinised as Riyadh is simply trying to cover up its failings by projecting a victory of its belief by showcasing the mammoth rally experienced in the oil price which is far from the doings of its actions.

Saudi Arabia should be cautious in its approach to how it intends of resolving disputes amongst members especially those who take issue with itself. All it needs to be reminded of this is the deputy crown prince's plans to make the Kingdom less reliant on black gold and diversified in other areas of investment. The retaliatory backlash it could face from within its own OPEC membership could derail those plans altogether and place it in its own dilemma, a fate I can't think it envisions itself in.

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Nigeria plans to drop its currency peg

I wrote a piece last week detailing the political risk that's being created as a result of the decline in oil prices with specific focus on Nigeria and Venezuela as good examples. I stated that both these countries had been over reliant on oil to generate fiscal revenues resulting in a disastrous outcome that's currently plaguing their respective economies.

Of Nigeria, I said that the lack of sufficient oil revenues was placing a cash drain on the finance ministry that would cripple the Nigerian government's efforts to ward off the insurgency of terrorist group Boko Haram who've sown a reign of horror throughout the West African country.

New information shows that the Nigerian government and finance ministry are four months behind on announcing the annual budget prompting many to believe that the nation could be headed into an economic contraction which isn't far fetched if you weigh up the severity of the foreign currency reserve depletion as a result of foreign firms demand for dollars far outstripping supply causing an imbalance in the accounts of the Central Bank of Nigeria.

A peg pipped against the US Dollar has failed to restrain the Naira from depreciating away from the pegged level of 200 with the 12 month forward rate Naira-Dollar being quoted as much 50-60% weaker than the peg.

Calls to drop the peg have been met with resistance from newly incumbent president Muhammadu Buhari who believes that the harshness of inflation that would flow into the economy as a result of a sharp depreciation would likely unhinge all the good work done in building up a solid foundation for the country's economy. Most critics believe Buhari didn't have a clear grasp of the developments happening in the oil market and thus over leveraged his bets of a bounce materialising at much higher levels. Again strong evidence of the over reliance on oil to generate government revenue.

But in a twist of events Central Bank of Nigeria Governor Godwin Emefiele said the bank would be operating its foreign currency market based on a flexible system that would allow the free market to dictate equilibrium, hinting at reforms that would help the nation prosper in an easier motion.

The move came as much of a surprise as it did a shock for most who had expected some type of drastic measure to be implemented to prevent further economic calamity descending into the levels of despondency. Nevertheless the reaction from all quarters of its financial markets pointed to a favourably vote of confidence in the move.

Before we see any normality return into the fray, Nigeria will experience a much anticipated recession that could've been prevented had the government not acted quicker in removing the currency peg yet the long term benefits that would accrue from its existence far outweigh any short term discomfort founded on the back of a sudden adaption to a shock to the system.

The risk that once added additional return no longer resides in the investment equation making the flow of capital less hesitant to place its economically beneficial substance that'll find its way freely into the financial system and channel itself to where its needed most, breathing life back into a good story to tell.

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Oil isn't only presenting an economic risk with its price decline

If you've been an avid reader of this blog you'd have noticed the topic of oil has come up often in my daily commentary with my belief that the development of this theme will not cease to exist for some time yet. I can recall commenting on the sudden drop in oil prices and subsequent bounce expressing my opinion that oil was a sector that would become a pool of interest in the next few years. Needless to say the commodity hasn't disappointed the skeptics who have been flooded with material to write about in their debates and arguments around its production.

Much of the focus this year has centred around the growing tensions between Saudi Arabia, the defacto leader of OPEC and its rival Iran who has recently been unshackled from international sanctions that prevented it from trading its most valuable product, oil, with the rest of the world.

However the last few days has seen that attention being taken away from the impending blow up of relations between both nations and directed towards supply interruptions that's seemingly fuelling (for a lack of the word) the price of oil in the last few weeks. We've seen the devastating wildfires in Canada halting a significant proportion of oil production due to the quickening pace with which the fire has spread that posed a risk of potentially huge damages if it reached oil fields but it looks as if authorities have got the situation under control.

Although the supply interruption from this event was grave enough to cause a spike in price, it's not the type of event that will be ongoing over the medium term. I stress this because if we are to see oil prices recover fully from the slump they've experienced we'll need to see a sustained situation that would support the price recovery.

In saying this and having closely followed the oil crises since its beginning in 2014, I've taken note of two important oil producers who were the first member nations in OPEC to make an appeal to Saudi Arabia to find resolve at the height of the plunge. Both Nigeria and Venezuela have borne the most economic damage following Saudi Arabia's decision to expand production in its efforts to push out US shale gas producers.

I've previously stated that if Saudi Arabia failed to get Iran to commit to an oil production freeze it could be seen as the former overlooking the defiance of the latter with the need for close cooperation being top priority when maintaining stability in a collusive agreement. The failure to do so would cause other nations to frown upon their weighting of views and possibly cause fissures between the relationship between OPEC and themselves.

This exact implication is what I believe to be happening in OPEC at the moment with both Nigeria and Venezuela stirring up fear amongst international investors over the economic dilemma each find themselves in with the outcome leading to oil production cuts.

Nigeria's cost curve means it requires higher prices to break even, a scenario that hasn't been present for some time. Together with this the added pressure of terrorist group Boko Haram's reign of villainous attacks on the Nigerian community in fighting for a wider acceptance of Muslim minority in the country.

However the problematic situation Nigeria finds itself in at present is as a direct consequence of suppressed oil prices, bleeding the country's foreign currency reserves to near zero causing economic despair as never seen before.

The change of guard in government is left stagnant in its progression as the new cabinet along with president Muhammadu Buhari grapple with a serious cash drain on fiscal accounts as most tax revenues are raised from oil income. Although tough talking in their way to winning the election, the party sits toothless in its defence against terrorism placing it on the back burner as higher priorities take precedent over everything else.  

But neglecting to defend its people, the country has become vulnerable to more terrorist attacks with the latest attacks taking aim at oil pipelines in an effort to sabotage the benefits of foreign receipts. The growing concern amongst the international community has led to a number of leaders, most notably the United States coming to the aid of Nigeria to stop the incursion of further attacks that could risk stability in the region.
Venezuela has had a long history of disrupting foreign investment into its oil sector being a nation that holds the world's largest reserves. The countries insistence of stated owned oil assets has led to oil production being poorly developed, an often cited argument in the debate over whether stated owned production is the right economic body in producing black gold in the country.

The country's reliance of oil as a means to raise government revenue is even greater than that of Nigeria translating into a detrimental impact on the economy when the price of oil exhibits shocks that can't be smoothed out. The situation on the ground has become so unbearable that fresh water is being rationed and electricity outages are a common occurrence as government tries in vain to get a hold on an epidemic atmosphere hanging over the country.

Similarity exists between Venezuela and Nigeria in foreign reserves having been depleted however the extent of the crises differs in that the Venezuelan government has restricted the access of dollars from importers coupled with price controls meaning mass shortages of basic necessities such as food, medicine and even toilet paper! The government's unwillingness to loosen its hold on the economy has meant that tensions are rising to a point where rumours of unseating president Nicolas Maduro have rooted themselves in the public as clashes with security forces increases on escalated agitation.
In concluding, one needs to consider not only the economic risk an uncertain oil environment presents to oil producers but also the political instability that becomes born into the economies whose over reliance and ill-equipped government policies lead their nations into economic distress. OPEC's relevance might be fading slowly with petty squabbles but its impact on smaller nations of which its own policies were suppose to uplift them is suddenly tearing them apart.

Monday, 9 May 2016

Saudi Arabian Prince Mohammed bin Salman reshuffles cabinet to shore up power

It was only last week that an Iranian deputy military commander warned off the US and its allies over an attacks on its kingdom saying it was prepared to close the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial gateway for oil produced in the Middle East to leave the region and delivered to the rest of the world, if it found their actions threatening in any way. These comments clearly sent a message of defiance to the West who've recently unshackled Tehran from years of sanctions.

I wrote an article last week Thursday expressing my opinion that Iran was harming the image of its nation in the international community by playing the contemptuous card in the actions and comments it made so early into its readmission. When the mention of "US and its allies" reached the ears of Riyadh, many knew that would be some sort of retaliation from the Arab Kingdom.

When asked last month what Saudi Arabia would do if Iran was unprepared to agree to freeze oil production along with other OPEC members, Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman stated that Saudi was ready and able to increase their production at any moment. He also went on to say that Riyadh had the capability of increasing its oil producing capacity to 20 million barrels a day if the kingdom decided on investing further in its oil sector.

These comments came as a threat to Tehran who subsequently didn't arrive at the oil summit in Doha, making up a well of excuses for its non-attendances but as it boils down we see this was a tactic by them to test Saudi's willingness to go forward with their own threats. The remarks made by an Iranian deputy military commander were simply a means to stir the provocation even more to measure the level of tolerance.

It didn't take long for Saudi Arabia to respond with the latest shake up causing analysts to stop and reassess the influence of the Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's power in matters relating to the economy of the kingdom.

Salman has fired prolific oil minister Ali al-Naimi who had served in his position for 21 years and replacing him with Aramco chairman Khalid al-Falih, showing his desire to take more control over the situation which is developing between themselves and Iran. The influential discretion afforded to al-Naimi in terms of his powers to formulate oil policy in Saudi Arabia and OPEC helped shore away the kingdoms conflict with other members in the Middle Eastern region namely Iraq and Iran.
However Salman's sweeping changes has shifted the perspective view on Saudi Arabia with many believing the 30 year old's aggressive approach could indicate a heightened and tense geopolitical situation building up that could possibly interrupt the supply of oil.

The Saudi prince has been tasked with transitioning his family's kingdom from an oil dependent nation into a more diverse economy reaping its benefits towards a greater number of sector, an immediate acknowledgement that the risk presented in the current oil market doesn't mitigate itself over the long term and the onset of alternative sources of energy provides a real threat to the industry.

Although Salman might be ambitious in his desires, the success of his plan will be the function of how well he is able to diverse the kingdom's reliance on oil into other sectors but at the same time retain control over OPEC so as to have a larger weighting on the direction of oil prices and thus more certainty during its transitive period.

Iran stands in the way of this presenting the prince with a problematic situation to deal with; if he allows Tehran to continue producing, the benefits that could be rendered from a unified cooperation would take longer because the deficits would consistently be cancelled out by the added production from Iran. One needs reminding that nothing stops Iran from going over and above its targeted production in its own ambitions to wrestle control away from Saudi Arabia, an outcome that could be disastrous for Riyadh as they'd no longer have discretion over direction.

Salman's thinking would be on par with a tit-for-tat playground attitude in the sense that if the Saudi kingdom can't get what it wants then no one will get anything, even if it means taking on financial strain in the process.

The prince knows that Iran is desperate to get back on track which is indicative from the enormous capital spend it's laid out in the area of air and rail transportation. This certainly doesn't stop here but the expansion of this program would require a healthy and stable climate in the oil market to emerge which is seeming unlikely given these turns of events.

This would be an incredible risk to take on after the kingdom admittedly suffered defeat at the hands of US shale gas producers by initiating the proposal to freeze production. There intention the last time round was to secure market share by squeezing out these new competitive players which hasn't worked.

I look at things this way, either Saudi Arabia is going to stamp its authority on the dominance oil or its going to end very badly for the Arab Kingdom. With the type of economic developments evolving in the world, I wouldn't think it would be appropriate to be taking on such a risk but only time will tell.  

Monday, 18 April 2016

Saudi Arabia stands by its tough talk with no involvement from Iran

Oil producers were unable to agree on a deal in Doha that could've seen the production of the commodity frozen for a set period in an effort to lift prices that have traded near 12 year lows. The oil summit was called after Saudi Arabia along with Russia, Qatar and Venezuela proposed to freeze their production on condition that other producers including that of Non-Opec nations, did the same. This prerequisite came from the insistence of Saudi Arabia who's been at loggerheads with neighbours Iran who refuse to follow such a plan.

In an interview with Bloomberg last week, deputy crown prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud stated that the country wasn't willing to strike a deal without the involvement of Iran and should a deal not be agreed too the oil rich kingdom could immediately raise production to over 11.5 million barrels per day which would add even MORE supply to an oversupplied market.

As much spin as Tehran tries to put on the reasoning for their absence no doubt has been left that the real intention behind the nonattendance was to test Riyadh's threats of turning its back on a deal should their conditions not be met which is now clearly known.

But as much as Saudi has stood by what its said it does also paint a grim scenario for the price of Black Gold should they move ahead with plans to expand production aimed at crippling other producers and stamping their authority on the dominance of oil supply. Mohammed bin Salman was in an retortive mood when he hinted that his nation could increase production too as much as 20 million barrels per day if it invested considerable capital into the oil industry.
One thing is for certain and that is Saudi Arabia may have become alarmed by the emerging trend of bleeding foreign reserves to cushion the blow from lower oil prices however their stash hasn't been so badly affected that it causes those in charge to lie awake at night just thinking about it.

Iran is at a distinct disadvantage here while only having just been released from the shackles of sanctions from the international community. They'd need to see a higher oil price to benefit properly from the sale of their produce to be certain of repairing the economic damage caused through the years of non-inclusion in world trade.

But Saudi Arabia could suffer much more over the long term by making their allies believe that their interest in OPEC lies not in the common good of all members but rather on their own self-centred needs. In protecting their market share, Riyadh is showing the world that it's not willing to compromise its own dominance while asking others to do so with dire consequences attached to the lack of following instructions.

In the age of globalisation, world trade has grown stronger and ties between nation don't only depend on economic coordination as had been the case for many years. Money talks and so it walks when the deal no longer makes sense for both parties. Saudi's bullyboy tactics might stab at the short term benefits that could've been captured if Iran's detachment from the deal was overlook but the longer term implication hold a shaky ground for those who now see Saudi's dictatorial rule over OPEC as oppressive to economic prosperity.    

Thursday, 14 April 2016

The 3 players that matter the most in Doha oil talks

With three days left to go to the start of the much anticipated oil summit set to take place between OPEC and Non-OPEC producing nations held in Doha, most market participants remain skeptical that a long term positive outcome can be found when leaders sit down to discuss a possible oil production freeze.

I've been following the story since the middle of last year and have stated a number of times that a resolution to this matter will only be found when the biggest producers are the ones at the tail end of the economic damage which has slowly materialised. Up until a few months ago Saudi Arabia had remained steadfast in its decision to rid the market of alternative producers in the US by flooding the market with barrels of oil.

This initially worked with US shale producers feeling the pinch and responding almost immediately with closures of wells that couldn't break even as well as preparing for a financial storm that had been brewing over the levels of debt created in starting up these new ventures. However it didn't stop these producers from exploiting the richest wells with quantity aplenty to help them extend their stay in the oil market a little while longer and become a frustration to the Saudi's.

Added to this a new problem was slowly starting to emerge within the context of the entire world economy where the growth needed to stoke the coals of  the economic engine were found wanting with both the US and China letting up far more than would be necessary to nudge things forward.

Double whammy...

Having heard cries of help from other minor producers in OPEC, Saudi merely let those calls fall on deaf ears as they proceeded on but its placed them in a vulnerable position within the oil producing community. Saudi's efforts to curb its ill gotten plans that have backfired and put not only their well-being at jeopardy but the entire membership of OPEC, leaving them open to harsh reactions from those it failed to listen to.

This can't be a good footing to stand on when negotiating the stability of oil prices let alone a steady and consistent relationship amongst its peers in OPEC where co-operation from each party is an absolute necessity which is what we find with fellow member Iran.      
Iran's readmission into the oil market has dampened the outlook for the supposed Black Gold as the inventory of barrels stockpiled in Tehran is bound to be sold off to help aid an economy that's been economically isolated for a number of years.

However the relationship between Tehran and Riyadh hasn't been favourable at the best of times and the recent announcement by Saudi proposing a production freeze was met with a cold tone of defiance when Iran's oil minister was quizzed whether his country would be participating in such agreement. Tehran  had explicitly stated its objection to such a proposal before Saudi gave details of a possible way of halting the oil glut.

Sensing that Tehran could drag its heels, Saudi decided to find a better suited candidate that would give an extra notch of credibility to its plans to slow down the rate of oil production worldwide. Russia currently produces 10.9 million barrels per day marginally outstripping that of Saudi Arabia who is currently on 10.6 million bpd. Merging a plan together with both these players does add a degree of a no nonsense approach to the proposal but does it have the staying power to convince others?

Russia tactically got involved as it sees itself becoming a more prominent player in the oil market, possibly suggesting why the annexation of Crimea proved to be a hasty decision taken by Russian President Vladimir Putin. It's also got in on an oil deal with China that OPEC had hoped would've been swung its way but was beaten to the chase having devoting its attention to the oil price wars with the US.

But we should not forget that Russia's own economy has been crippled by the sanctions imposed on it from the West following the annexation of Crimea. Oil plays a significant role in providing much needed income in rebuilding the Russian economy and if Putin's ambitions are anything to go by don't expect anything less than astounding.
Since Saudi Arabia is seen as the leader of OPEC and possibly oil producers, their choice in strategy to freeze production as opposed to cut production was taken because they feels vulnerable of losing this status if it fails to play their cards properly which could see a hugely influential West losing its grip on oil supply since Washington and Riyadh hold close ties that sees a cordial understanding in keeping oil prices and production steady.

It's not a hidden secret that Iran has suffered from the economic sanctions imposed on it by the US and its dissatisfaction at the way Saudi Arabia has handled threats of new entrants to the oil market. Iran has capacity capable of meeting that of Saudi which would almost diminish the relevance of the latter should they chose to cut back production.

Russia on the other hand sees its ambition to play a more influential role on world politics as a priority with oil being strategic to this goal. It wouldn't miss an opportunity to circle a "wounded animal" so as to say when they see the pressure Saudi has come under in the waking months. Putin is too much of a political manoeuvrist to pass up such a chance to take power away from a controlling nation.

It's because of the above scenarios that I don't see the likelihood of a oil production freeze having an major impact on prices over the long term. The market remains critical and with profit margins being squeezed and debt hanging over the heads of management any significant jump in the price would yield an immediate flurry of selling from producers, pushing back the price from whence it came.

Thursday, 17 March 2016

Oil producing nations to meet in Doha to discuss production freeze

Scouring through social media this morning my eye got a glance of an interesting chart that caught my attention with much thought over the developing situation happening in OPEC after selected members announced an output freeze. The chart in question is that of the Oil Volatility Index (OVX) spanning back to July 2014 when the rout began with an evident uptrend in place that surprisingly took a crucial step in defining a bottom for the commodity.

Although 2016 didn't start off on the best footing for oil we've seen a subsequent bounce following a number of developments happening from both OPEC and US shale gas producers. The responsiveness of US producers to a declining oil price can be seen in a stronger trend downwards in the number of wells in operation. A significant part of the uncertainty stirred up last year surrounded the ability of firms to service the debt they had accumulated during their expansionary phase years earlier.

This risk remains on the table even though with every dollar the price inches upward deep sighs of relief can be heard, troubling signs that renewed oil strength might encourage producers with stagnate wells to once again begin turning on their taps negating any positiveness found in this current rally.

Then you have to consider the ructions happening inside OPEC concerning members acceptance to bring about a production freeze that's been agreed upon so far by Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, Qatar and non member Russia in an effort to curb quantities being delivered to market. However there's been heavy disinterest in partaking in this endeavour from Iran due to sanctions being recently uplifted added to the already fractiousness relationship between Tehran and Riyadh.

In saying this we cannot neglect to note the significance of this turning point of volatility in oil price, it's something that might suggest that the developments around these issues are starting to produce positive sentiments from market participants who feel a little more confident than what they were three months ago.
News of a meeting between major oil producers from both ends of the spectrum next month helped spur the market on indicating Saudi's preparedness to sidestep Iran in its quest to see higher oil prices. Such a meeting if concluded successfully would all but seal the fate for oil and there's a desperate need from both sides to see some sort of stability.

By including Non-OPEC members Saudi Arabia has conceding to the fact that oil competitors are here to stay for the long term, a scenario it had refused to envision by implicitly driving up oil output to eliminate these high cost producers. This plan has resulted in the Arab oil empire haemorrhaging extensive government leverage only to see it fail miserably.

For US shale gas producer this might be the lifeline they were looking for and would do well to see some conclusive deal reached if they're wanting to succeed over the long term. They would need to stress urgency in the execution of such a deal as time is running out for them as cash flows tightening further and creditors coming knocking at the door.

Overall I think the world consumer may have not participated as much in this current price decline as one would've expected due to the strong dollar amongst all the world's currencies. It can also be said that the effects of lower oil prices on US consumers haven't economic growth either with many begging the question, what will happen next?