Showing posts with label Nigeria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nigeria. Show all posts

Friday, 4 November 2016

Egypt joins the party in removing currency peg

The Central Bank of Egypt moved swiftly to implement economic reforms in order to meet the required conditions set out by the International Monetary Fund that could secure a much needed $12 billion in loans from the organisation to ease the nation's woes following a suppressive period of political instability that's brought on interruption in key sectors within the economy, causing the necessitating flow of growth to be halted.  

Perhaps the most notable reform involves the peg on the country's currency, the Egyptian Pound, being scrapped in favour of a floating currency to facilitate the temptation of foreign investors to external funding to it's shores and replenish the gaping hole found in the nation's reserve's that's seemingly making it difficult for government to work around the depletion of funds to pay for essential imports.  

This move follows closer on the back of the Central Bank of Nigeria's decision to remove the peg on it's currency, the Naira, against the US Dollar based similar grounds to their northern neighbours.

Both countries have risen and fallen out the ranks of top African economy a number of times in the past few months with many economists saying the current economic situation is merely temporary and expect to see their respective economies to revive themselves after introducing these measures.  
At the time when Nigeria made the transition from a fixed exchange to a floating one I had said the move was a good decision and showed the economic policy maturity needed to accelerate the progression of its economy. I also said that we couldn't expect short term relief from it's implementation and stressed the importance of more being done to attract longer term funding.

My view would stay the same in the case of Egypt and probably any other country that applies a fixed rate exchange rate to it's currency. The interconnectedness of the world as a result of globalisation has meant the flow of capital is allowed the freedom to find its way into economic systems outside its borders.

In saying this, the quickness in expansion of monetary supply from major economies at low interest rates for an extended period has meant capital flight in exchange for return has effectively toppled over a once practical solution to control the trade between countries.

Furthermore its influential nature to promote the free market in economies where large inefficiencies had taken place essentially means the world is moving towards an openness in the dynamics of supply and demand where price is matched up against the scarcity of quantity.

Perhaps there are some advantages to Quantitative Easing ...

Wednesday, 15 June 2016

MTN's commitment to Nigeria neither good nor bad

Just days after Africa's largest mobile telecommunication provider MTN agreed to pay a fine of $1.7 billion(roughly a third of the initial fine) to the Nigerian government the company committed to double capital spending in the next year as it attempts to fix the trust between itself and the government.

The Group's Nigerian business failed to disconnect unregistered subscribers before the given deadline prompting the Nigerian Communication Commission (NCC) to impose the maximum penalty per user after the cut off date equating to a fine of $5.2 billion.

Considering that Nigeria represents a hefty size of the Group's total profit and revenue, the company was backed into a corner with the range of options it could employ to eliminate the harshness of the penalty that would put a dent in the future outlook by heeding to the demands of the Nigerian government.

Of course government took this into account when they participated in negotiations given the horrid year they've experienced after attaining progressive and long term beneficial financial market improvements on home soil that saw interest in investments soar. The economic collapse suffered as a result of the slump in oil prices might've slowed down policy implementation but it certainly didn't stop policymakers from forging the way forward.

Recent news from the Central Bank of Nigeria expressing its intention to launch a dual-currency exchange rate is just one of the economic reforms government wishes to introduce.

The case with MTN is no exception with the Nigerian government using the fine as a tool to negotiate a local listing of the company's Nigerian operations to boost the image of the Nigerian Stock Exchange as a home for foreign companies looking to house their businesses.

However the manner in which they went about it may leave a lot left to be desired.

Bullyboy tactics might pressure big corporates such as MTN, who have plenty to lose, into agreements that fits the strategy of the government while disregarding the timing of such a move as well as the impact on its company, it would also make those contemplating investment think twice before doing so.    

Wednesday, 8 June 2016

Nigeria's pledge to float currency is a false start

In late May the Central Bank of Nigeria Governor Godwin Emefiele told market participants that the bank was preparing to remove the peg it had against the US dollar because it could no longer support its currency, the Naira, after haemorrhaging foreign currency reserves due to the slump in oil prices that created a vacuum between the funding and disbursements in its trading account.

No date was given at the time however Emefiele said it was "a matter of days" before the country would introduce a flexible exchange rate policy with authorities at work to make it happen. This was in sharp contrast to what Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari had envisioned being a fierce defender of the peg in an effort to shield his citizens from abnormally high inflation.

It now turns out that the Nigerian finance ministry is evading the implementation of such measures by stalling investors and refusing to give a set date to when they can expect the new policy to take effect.

What looked to be a positive reform in acknowledging the faults of the current system and proposing an overhaul of the central mechanism that allows foreign trade to take place has effectively shown the differing views between the CBN and the Nigerian government.

Firstly investors detest political squabbling, putting it down to the creation of uncertainty in the pathway moving forward with crucial policy changes needed to revitalise the economy. If an uncertain environment exists investors opt to sit on the sidelines.

Added to this the Nigerian government's bureaucratic processes, which must be said isn't isolated to this country only, strangles the progression of its economy and the need to realise that it cannot be a fixture when attempting to attract investors to its shores becomes more evident when an outcome such as this begins to take shape.

Lastly it highlights the government's underestimation of the enormity of the task which doesn't bode well for confidence in their ability to manage the domestic financial system, generating further risks that require more return to be poised to invest in the country, a situation that only gets compounded by the current economic downturn.  

Wednesday, 25 May 2016

Nigeria plans to drop its currency peg

I wrote a piece last week detailing the political risk that's being created as a result of the decline in oil prices with specific focus on Nigeria and Venezuela as good examples. I stated that both these countries had been over reliant on oil to generate fiscal revenues resulting in a disastrous outcome that's currently plaguing their respective economies.

Of Nigeria, I said that the lack of sufficient oil revenues was placing a cash drain on the finance ministry that would cripple the Nigerian government's efforts to ward off the insurgency of terrorist group Boko Haram who've sown a reign of horror throughout the West African country.

New information shows that the Nigerian government and finance ministry are four months behind on announcing the annual budget prompting many to believe that the nation could be headed into an economic contraction which isn't far fetched if you weigh up the severity of the foreign currency reserve depletion as a result of foreign firms demand for dollars far outstripping supply causing an imbalance in the accounts of the Central Bank of Nigeria.

A peg pipped against the US Dollar has failed to restrain the Naira from depreciating away from the pegged level of 200 with the 12 month forward rate Naira-Dollar being quoted as much 50-60% weaker than the peg.

Calls to drop the peg have been met with resistance from newly incumbent president Muhammadu Buhari who believes that the harshness of inflation that would flow into the economy as a result of a sharp depreciation would likely unhinge all the good work done in building up a solid foundation for the country's economy. Most critics believe Buhari didn't have a clear grasp of the developments happening in the oil market and thus over leveraged his bets of a bounce materialising at much higher levels. Again strong evidence of the over reliance on oil to generate government revenue.

But in a twist of events Central Bank of Nigeria Governor Godwin Emefiele said the bank would be operating its foreign currency market based on a flexible system that would allow the free market to dictate equilibrium, hinting at reforms that would help the nation prosper in an easier motion.

The move came as much of a surprise as it did a shock for most who had expected some type of drastic measure to be implemented to prevent further economic calamity descending into the levels of despondency. Nevertheless the reaction from all quarters of its financial markets pointed to a favourably vote of confidence in the move.

Before we see any normality return into the fray, Nigeria will experience a much anticipated recession that could've been prevented had the government not acted quicker in removing the currency peg yet the long term benefits that would accrue from its existence far outweigh any short term discomfort founded on the back of a sudden adaption to a shock to the system.

The risk that once added additional return no longer resides in the investment equation making the flow of capital less hesitant to place its economically beneficial substance that'll find its way freely into the financial system and channel itself to where its needed most, breathing life back into a good story to tell.

Wednesday, 18 May 2016

Oil isn't only presenting an economic risk with its price decline

If you've been an avid reader of this blog you'd have noticed the topic of oil has come up often in my daily commentary with my belief that the development of this theme will not cease to exist for some time yet. I can recall commenting on the sudden drop in oil prices and subsequent bounce expressing my opinion that oil was a sector that would become a pool of interest in the next few years. Needless to say the commodity hasn't disappointed the skeptics who have been flooded with material to write about in their debates and arguments around its production.

Much of the focus this year has centred around the growing tensions between Saudi Arabia, the defacto leader of OPEC and its rival Iran who has recently been unshackled from international sanctions that prevented it from trading its most valuable product, oil, with the rest of the world.

However the last few days has seen that attention being taken away from the impending blow up of relations between both nations and directed towards supply interruptions that's seemingly fuelling (for a lack of the word) the price of oil in the last few weeks. We've seen the devastating wildfires in Canada halting a significant proportion of oil production due to the quickening pace with which the fire has spread that posed a risk of potentially huge damages if it reached oil fields but it looks as if authorities have got the situation under control.

Although the supply interruption from this event was grave enough to cause a spike in price, it's not the type of event that will be ongoing over the medium term. I stress this because if we are to see oil prices recover fully from the slump they've experienced we'll need to see a sustained situation that would support the price recovery.

In saying this and having closely followed the oil crises since its beginning in 2014, I've taken note of two important oil producers who were the first member nations in OPEC to make an appeal to Saudi Arabia to find resolve at the height of the plunge. Both Nigeria and Venezuela have borne the most economic damage following Saudi Arabia's decision to expand production in its efforts to push out US shale gas producers.

I've previously stated that if Saudi Arabia failed to get Iran to commit to an oil production freeze it could be seen as the former overlooking the defiance of the latter with the need for close cooperation being top priority when maintaining stability in a collusive agreement. The failure to do so would cause other nations to frown upon their weighting of views and possibly cause fissures between the relationship between OPEC and themselves.

This exact implication is what I believe to be happening in OPEC at the moment with both Nigeria and Venezuela stirring up fear amongst international investors over the economic dilemma each find themselves in with the outcome leading to oil production cuts.

Nigeria's cost curve means it requires higher prices to break even, a scenario that hasn't been present for some time. Together with this the added pressure of terrorist group Boko Haram's reign of villainous attacks on the Nigerian community in fighting for a wider acceptance of Muslim minority in the country.

However the problematic situation Nigeria finds itself in at present is as a direct consequence of suppressed oil prices, bleeding the country's foreign currency reserves to near zero causing economic despair as never seen before.

The change of guard in government is left stagnant in its progression as the new cabinet along with president Muhammadu Buhari grapple with a serious cash drain on fiscal accounts as most tax revenues are raised from oil income. Although tough talking in their way to winning the election, the party sits toothless in its defence against terrorism placing it on the back burner as higher priorities take precedent over everything else.  

But neglecting to defend its people, the country has become vulnerable to more terrorist attacks with the latest attacks taking aim at oil pipelines in an effort to sabotage the benefits of foreign receipts. The growing concern amongst the international community has led to a number of leaders, most notably the United States coming to the aid of Nigeria to stop the incursion of further attacks that could risk stability in the region.
Venezuela has had a long history of disrupting foreign investment into its oil sector being a nation that holds the world's largest reserves. The countries insistence of stated owned oil assets has led to oil production being poorly developed, an often cited argument in the debate over whether stated owned production is the right economic body in producing black gold in the country.

The country's reliance of oil as a means to raise government revenue is even greater than that of Nigeria translating into a detrimental impact on the economy when the price of oil exhibits shocks that can't be smoothed out. The situation on the ground has become so unbearable that fresh water is being rationed and electricity outages are a common occurrence as government tries in vain to get a hold on an epidemic atmosphere hanging over the country.

Similarity exists between Venezuela and Nigeria in foreign reserves having been depleted however the extent of the crises differs in that the Venezuelan government has restricted the access of dollars from importers coupled with price controls meaning mass shortages of basic necessities such as food, medicine and even toilet paper! The government's unwillingness to loosen its hold on the economy has meant that tensions are rising to a point where rumours of unseating president Nicolas Maduro have rooted themselves in the public as clashes with security forces increases on escalated agitation.
In concluding, one needs to consider not only the economic risk an uncertain oil environment presents to oil producers but also the political instability that becomes born into the economies whose over reliance and ill-equipped government policies lead their nations into economic distress. OPEC's relevance might be fading slowly with petty squabbles but its impact on smaller nations of which its own policies were suppose to uplift them is suddenly tearing them apart.