Political risk back in the spotlight as possible bond default shocks

Arguably the strongest contender to make the biggest waves in financial markets in the second half of this year are negative yields on bonds which have gradually evolved from merely a concerned thought into a desperate situation described only by the panic acquisitions of similar instruments containing positive returns regardless of the risk attached to it that could very well overshadow the scale of catastrophe when compared to the Financial Crisis of 2008/09.

Late in July I wrote a piece about the rapid transmission of funds from bonds markets in the developed world in favour of fixed income securities in emerging markets that offer the very least of a positive yield. The reason being the protracted use of monetary stimulant in the form of negative interest rate policy in countries such as Japan, Switzerland and the European Union in bid to purge economic stagnancy setting in.

At the time I concluded the absence of rationality from investors when considering all risks embedded in an instrument was an alarming notion to contemplate yet the onset of such a view has already infected the current market sentiment with disastrous consequences.

A twig of sensibility should be heeded in the latest reports coming out of Mongolia where newly elected government officials have stated their intentions to avoid default on its country's debt at all costs. This after the Mongolian bond market saw a surge in demand for its fixed income securities from positive yield seekers finding refuge from the financial storm.    

Yield-seekers get reality check as Mongolia sounds alarm on economic crisis @natashadoff https://t.co/8ZPwmBW7SL pic.twitter.com/5iVYZaqBjz

— Emerging Markets (@BloombergEM) August 11, 2016

However they hadn't counted on an outcome such as this to occur which meant it sent shockwaves throughout the Mongolian financial market once it was heard. But surely how can one blame the prudence of government especially in times when austerity is needed? It's nonsensical.

The matter goes straight to back to what's been said earlier; the irrational investors as opposed to the norm of rationality has blurred the outlook of financial markets to such an extent that not all risks have been considered leaving investors vulnerable to being caught in sudden price changing events.

Political risks stemming from emerging markets have grown in frequency due to their interconnectivity with big brother China in reference to trade relations. The contraction of the Chinese economy has not only hardened the view of its citizens but also those who have suffered gravely as a result of a slump in trade with communist reforming nation.

Besides this, the economic outlook has shifted vastly from prosperity to despair translating directly into potential political shockwaves occurring from the dissatisfaction of citizens on its governments which isn't fully being accounted for in terms of risk. Mongolia might be the first but certainly won't be the last offering an inkling of what can progress if the issue of negative interest rate policy isn't addressed with true reflection of its impacts on the rest of the world.