Investors vs. Policymakers: Who's suffering the most from Confirmation Bias?

There's a term in psychology that refers to a person's mindset when his/her ability to perceive a situation without bias is hindered by the insistence of their beliefs being accurate in every detail to such an extent they jeopardize possessing full clarity by ignoring information that refutes their view and paying attention only to that which supports it.

If you haven't heard of it before, it's called confirmation bias, a well documented human tendency that has significant relevance within financial markets, specifically towards those responsible for taking decisions based on opinions of an investment.

However I'm not here to talk about the decisions made by investors which might be overcome by this bias but rather those in prominent policymaking positions who dictate the direction of an economy as a whole and hold an influential role in deciding what balance works best.

One would think it's safe to assume that these figures have the necessary requirements to equip them with clear thought on growing variance on either side of the economic spectrum and in effect be bring about consistency to the pathway of growth instead of extremity.

BoJ doubles down on easy monetary policy https://t.co/vshzMQnKYs

— Financial Times (@FT) September 21, 2016

But this thought is becoming evermore irrelevant when we come to realise that the power once enjoyed by these economic mechanics are losing their influential grip of reality by overlooking data which suggests their actions do more to distort than anything else but instead choose to merrily continue along a path destined to produce failure.

The Bank of Japan announcement pertaining to the scrapping of monetary base targets and replacing it with "yield curve control" reiterates the point being made that central banks around the globe and more importantly those in the developed world aren't willing to admit defeat in the lack of substance of generating a full economic recovery from the toolbox of available policies.

Merely changing tactic won't change the skepticism being built up around the abilities of these policymakers to effectively take hold of the situation and steer proceedings in the right direction.